Including the invalid consent decree. SCOTUS could have taken that argument away from Trump/Pence by ruling on the Texas case, or even the pending Trump cases. By not doing so, they leave this argument to be made on the 6th. I love this argument since it can't be rejected based on a "not enough evidence" knee-jerk response to fraud allegations. A lot of ground is gained by adding this element to the objections on the 6th - a very good strategy.
Including the invalid consent decree. SCOTUS could have taken that argument away from Trump/Pence by ruling on the Texas case, or even the pending Trump cases. By not doing so, they leave this argument to be made on the 6th. I love this argument since it can't be rejected based on a "not enough evidence" knee-jerk response to fraud allegations. A lot of ground is gained by adding this element to the objections on the 6th - a very good strategy.
Can you explain this a bit.
It’s explained perfectly right here https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/12/its_for_mike_pence_to_judge_whether_a_presidential_election_was_held_at_all.html