17
Comments (13)
sorted by:
3
TownesVanCamp 3 points ago +3 / -0

One of us doesn’t read so well. It’s not me.

0
poconopede [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

id be willing to you haven't read any of his books while also expressing his statement of ignorance to u.s. history

1
TownesVanCamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am making no judgements on Michael malice. I am making a judgment on you. You cannot read. You fail to understand very basic words in the English language. Both his and mine.

0
poconopede [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

your judgment is ignorant of his statement and a lack of understanding of what conservatives believe the constitution to be. its not a sacred moral document its merely a legally binding one. the only people who truly consent to its rule were the signers.

1
TownesVanCamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bye. Kindergarten awaits you. Hopefully you find an old school teacher who can impart the Importance of reading comprehension.

1
poconopede [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

if u had the skill to debate the points provided you could save money on blood pressure medicine and universal healthcare argument wouldn't have any data to stand on

1
TownesVanCamp 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not going to go read books to to debate a one sentence Twittergram post. How you fail to understand that is beyond me. Take what he said and it’s pretty cut and dry. Have a good one.

1
poconopede [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

then i guess you'll never know if your right. u too

3
guitarslinger 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think you misinterpreted Mr. Malice. He apparently believes that Constitutional Conservatism requires a complete denial and/or ignorance of all of American history, which of course is the exact opposite of the truth.

0
poconopede [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

no the truth is when the bill of rights says, for example 2A, "congress shall make no law.." the ATF is created to do its bidding.