Only because these traitors put laws like the ECA and judicial precedent ahead of the plain language of the constitution. They are incapable of stepping outside the "traditions" that have been used to enslave us.
If the ECA differs from the constitution, then it is unconstitutional. Nowhere in the constitution is the authority to overturn laws/precedents limited to only SCOTUS. If the President believes something is unconstitutional then he should strike it down as such and ignore it.
Only because these traitors put laws like the ECA and judicial precedent ahead of the plain language of the constitution. They are incapable of stepping outside the "traditions" that have been used to enslave us.
If the ECA differs from the constitution, then it is unconstitutional. Nowhere in the constitution is the authority to overturn laws/precedents limited to only SCOTUS. If the President believes something is unconstitutional then he should strike it down as such and ignore it.