108
Comments (34)
sorted by:
7
nc777 7 points ago +7 / -0

Media constantly wants us to categorize each other.
They don't want you looking at someone and seeing a human person.
They want you to see a boomer, or a karen, or whatever category, and begin to assign a personality template to them even before you speak to them.
They want the plebs fighting each other so they don't attack the people running the show.

3
vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

The media also lie their asses off.

They go flat out accusing her of assault in the headline, then it goes down to “accosts” at the beginning of the article, then clarified that she just grabbed the boy (who probably did take her phone, but we won’t know from the media, they cover for black folks all the time).

Fucking liberals. They lead with the word “assault” to make people think she punched or harmed the kid, and that’s not what happened.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-5
deleted -5 points ago +7 / -12
0
MichellesLowFruit 0 points ago +1 / -1

All your spamming is only making you look like a nervous pedophile.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
3
mightiest_m 3 points ago +3 / -0

"The boy's family and civil rights attorney Ben Crump are calling for charges"

Beause of COURSE that race-baiting ambulance chaser is behind this. How's he even still allowed to practice after it was proven he was coaching fake witnesses?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
vote_for_MAGA_2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

White are under attack, worldwide. It’s blatantly obvious. The Covington Catholic kids hoax really cemented that fact in my brain.

3
MadeRightHere 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes.Ann Coulter, for all her flaws, did hit on a good phrase when she talked about "dead Beckys"--white women who DIDN'T trust their instincts.

3
ThatGuyWithThatThing 3 points ago +3 / -0

Crump is their attorney

Shouldn't be allowed to practice law after what he has done

2
shadypollster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that's not a karen at all.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
skye_fire 1 point ago +1 / -0

In addition to being anti-white, it's also specifically anti-female because it seems like there's no male analog (although I have heard people try to make Ken/Kevin happen).

-2
Buff_cousin_Elroy -2 points ago +3 / -5

Karen is just the caucasian version of Shaniqua

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
1
TentePede 1 point ago +6 / -5

The karen archetype is real, is a product of entitled feminism and will ruin your day. They get off on administrative violence, they often have been emboldened by the family courts and they absolutely took the kids. If you dont believe it go take a retail job for a few weeks

4
deleted 4 points ago +8 / -4
-2
newchina -2 points ago +3 / -5

What the fuck?! WHITE WOMEN are WHY WE ARE WHERE WE ARE TODAY. They’ve been debased. Look at HOW THEY VOTE!

5
MadeRightHere 5 points ago +5 / -0

They vote Trump. Stop believing media propaganda.

5
Tartarian-Kingz 5 points ago +7 / -2

Majority voted trump both times

0
newchina 0 points ago +3 / -3

Sauce, because I’ve seen the contrary.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
-5
deleted -5 points ago +2 / -7
4
deleted 4 points ago +7 / -3
-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
1
hunterhiden 1 point ago +3 / -2

You literally have no idea what you’re talking about but have fun being confused as hell

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
4
hunterhiden 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yes i forgot Trump was a San Francisco lawmaker

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
Tartarian-Kingz 0 points ago +1 / -1

They're why we need new civics classes