What libertarianism opposes is the illegitimate power of the state and control of its government, justified by the religious myth of authority, fiction of a “social contract”, and moral nonsense of “the greater good”, over the means of production, distribution and exchange.
It’s a blatant falsehood that it principally opposes any and all “restrictions” upon “capitalism”. Going by the libertarian notion of legitimacy through voluntary contract, that’s ipso facto false.
I love how Libertarians call ANY criticizm "straw man" lol
According to them thwir are no valid criticizms of Libertarianism because "if it works its Libertarianism. And if it didnt work then its not REAL Libertarianism" theyre just like socialists loll
In fact socialist could do the same thing.. every libertarian criticism of socialism is just a straw mann
More mere assertions. You have neither demonstrated that what you are talking about has anything to do with what libertarianism actually entails as to principles nor have you provided a single real-world example of libertarianism “failing”. But keep talking out your ass.
It’s compatible with libertarianism to deny that private ownership rights are so strong that you could freely acquire a monopoly. Read Lockes Proviso.
if you don’t like monopolies, why do think the only solution to monopolies is to literally create the biggest monopoly of all...like government monopolies over law and enforcement?
People who don’t have a clue what libertarianism shouldn’t make memes about libertarianism. This is like liberals talking about guns.
That's what unrestricted capitalism iss
And libertarianism isn’t “unrestricted capitalism”.
Yes it is
If it's not the name a single restriction on capitalism that libertarianism support
Again, no.
What libertarianism opposes is the illegitimate power of the state and control of its government, justified by the religious myth of authority, fiction of a “social contract”, and moral nonsense of “the greater good”, over the means of production, distribution and exchange.
It’s a blatant falsehood that it principally opposes any and all “restrictions” upon “capitalism”. Going by the libertarian notion of legitimacy through voluntary contract, that’s ipso facto false.
Straw man.
Nope.
I love how Libertarians call ANY criticizm "straw man" lol
According to them thwir are no valid criticizms of Libertarianism because "if it works its Libertarianism. And if it didnt work then its not REAL Libertarianism" theyre just like socialists loll
In fact socialist could do the same thing.. every libertarian criticism of socialism is just a straw mann
More mere assertions. You have neither demonstrated that what you are talking about has anything to do with what libertarianism actually entails as to principles nor have you provided a single real-world example of libertarianism “failing”. But keep talking out your ass.
Nice strawman statist cuck.
It’s compatible with libertarianism to deny that private ownership rights are so strong that you could freely acquire a monopoly. Read Lockes Proviso.
if you don’t like monopolies, why do think the only solution to monopolies is to literally create the biggest monopoly of all...like government monopolies over law and enforcement?