Unpopular opinion but gays who aren’t degenerate tweekers or liberal hostages are generally pretty successful. Much easier to focus on your success when you don’t have to deal with females apparently.
My opinion on the matter is that for a healthy, successful society you need a healthy support for the family unit.
However! There is certainly room for people who do not, for whatever reason, fit into that structure. But even those people benefit,either by being raised in a two parent home or by society being stable.
The communist lie is that you have to tear Western civilization apart to make progress.
Aye. Heterosexuality is the Fountain, the lone ecological pillar of civilization. It is the eternal spring from which all societal niches are possible. Defend it, preserve its premier position in the natural order, you enable prosperity, plurality, and freedom, to the extent that freedom can diverge from the norm yet also contribute to the norm from the periphery. Hierarchy can benefit from buttresses which diverge from the center. But choke the spring, implode the well, and eventually all will die. The still water will fester, and the culture will degenerate and then quickly smother itself. That is until a wiser culture moves in to revitalize the desert.
The comments on this thread are vaguely disturbing. They don't sound like Conservatives at all, they sound like Liberals. When the hell did this forum get onboard with the LGBT crap?
Lazy, entitled, narcissistic women have been missed by the scrutiny of society because of feminist political correctness.
These types of women are lauded as brave victims of circumstance while being propped up by the system and given preferential treatment in court and in welfare/housing benefits.
Meanwhile their character couldn't be a better example of degeneracy with their promiscuity and drug habits being framed as "empowering" by the mainstream culture.
Once being a lazy crackhead with seven kids from seven men is no longer socially acceptable we might start to steer our society back in the right direction but we still will have a long way to go.
Feminism has elevated women to the position of being a set of glorified holes on a human body whose purpose is to solicit validation from men enslaved to their carnal drives, all in the name of “empowerment”.
Women created the patriarchy (don’t believe me? Go to a sorority house and watch them enforce appearance standards before a formal “you can’t wear that dress”) because without the patriarchy, women are essentially feral.
Welfare + stupid crazy high child support, them skanks got it made. Courts need to stop punishing the male, who the fuck needs 1200/month for one child, ho be rolling around in a new car every two years and the child is dressed like a bum.
I used to work with this skank who had 4 kids by 2 or 3 different guys, none of the dad's around, who would openly admit that she got so much child support and public assistance that she didn't need to work, and the only reason she even worked part time was because she was bored.
Government has set her up so well that she doesn't have any need or desire to have a man around to help raise her kids, and she has so much leisure time on her hands that she can't stand it.
There is nothing noble or even necessary about building a system like this. It's not by and large saving starving kids or helpless single moms like we're all led to believe. It just lets lazy, irresponsible people continue to be lazy and irresponsible.
Apologies about my previous comment, I was feeling a bit... "psychotic", is the best I could describe it, even though I am an empathetic person, but now that I'm thinking rationally again, past accounts show that not all guys have a 'p' spot or they get no sexual pleasure whatsoever even if it's directly stimulated. Fully grown men have been raped throughout history, and there are some accounts where they feel no major orgasm coming from there, even though it's said that said spot makes it happen upon sufficient contact. There are men who have gone swimming in rivers and have had things go up their nether regions, and even though said creatures went up a little over past their 'p' spot area, they didn't get anything from it, so that leads me to conclude that some guys are blessed/cursed (depending on how you look at it) with having receptive prostates, while other guys are not. I know that I am one of the latter because there have been times post-puberty where I was constipated, so I repeatedly stuck 1-2 fingers up there to "clear it out", even with some cream that's said to help me get it out and with a baby wipe around them, and I got as many sexual feelings as picking my nose gives me, which is absolute 0.
Not gay if it's between a man and a woman. Words have meanings, and since we're not the left, we should respect them.
(Unless you mean gay as in derogatory, which is also an established and fair-use meaning, but given the potential for confusion here, it'd be best to insult prostate stimulation another way, since buttsex IS primary preferred by gay guys, due to lack of other venue.)
Debatable. If you're able to be pleased then the male member, then it's possible it could be "homo" if you're able to be pleased in homosexual sex. But even if it's not and you only partner up with an actual woman, you are, at the very least, a "bottom."
If we agree we want to interfere with how kids are raised, and I'm not sure we should, then it should be to encourage the nuclear family and strong community bound by family and cultural affinity. I.e. the same model that has worked fine the world over for millennia
We should be discouraging the welfare queen model, not encouraging odd parenting models.
The interference isn't explicit; nobody except psycho Marxists want to directly take children as wards of the state. The problem is incentivization: you get more of what you pay for (or tax less), and vice-versa. Cultural propaganda acts as a multiplier for these negative outcomes (for society as a whole, but of course benefitting those who want dominion over a servile, dependent population).
The point of this post is that they think there is some magical 🦄 utopia where the government loves you like the parent you never had. And then the government makes all the hard decisions for you and everything is beautiful and fantastical and best of all, FREE so you don't have to get up and go do hard work every day. Mental disorder.
Welfare is soul destroying and addictive. Work, being productive, is essential for self esteem. Welfare queens and kangs hate themselves and everybody else. They should be put in the first line for Bill Gates sterlilization/ vaccination.
"I hate NWO forced sterilization unless it happens to people I don't like"
Holy shit what is happening here. This is not conservative. This is not Trump's position. This is just pure nihilism hiding behind a paper-thin mask. Do you have actual political beliefs or are you just a misanthrope?
Being a tranny or what ever they chose to be called is up to them on how they live their lives. FORCING everyone to speak a certain way or believe a certain thing to enforce their beliefs in who they are, is just hypocrisy. Eliminating everyones right to their own belife is inhuman and ignorant. Their "you have to do x, y, z so I feel accepted" BS is inhuman.
That is the greatest truth that has lead to this point. People need to live and let live. Leave the children out of it, if people are not 100% the same...so be it. It's part of what makes America great.
“Live and Let live” was mostly for taxes and religious freedom among Christians but modern libertarians peverted that term and use it to justify all forms of degeneracy existing.
A society should have a line between freedom and order.
Is there a condition that makes you hate your genitals enough to get them lopped off? Sure, plausible. But in that case it's a mental disorder that should be treated with meds and/or therapy. Transitioning seems to rarely help.
That being said, adults can do what they please in my book. Likewise I am entitled to my own beliefs.
And that's exactly how Trump feels too. He has been crystal clear about the fact that he has no issue with gay people as long as they are also Patriots.
I think those types don’t identify as LGBTQABCD they probably just do what they do and be normal. Imagine telling everyone you’re hetero all the time that would be weird
It takes power or uniqueness away from them as silly as it sounds. Coming out of the closet was seen as brave to which society was fine with it. Now you have deranged trans and these moronic people with ridiculous pronouns in their same group which makes them look bad. Society doesn't give a shit if you're gay and mind your own business. We care if you put a burden on everyone else.
I'm a homo in tech, and trannies have made it where it's "the new normal" to state your damned pronouns on your profiles. I still refuse to do it. It's completely asinine that I have to state the obvious just because a tiny, tiny segment of the population demands it.
Preach friend. Fellow gay and trans person. I hate the LGBT community almost entirely. And all of these fake transtrenders running around making my life harder than necessary. It's exhausting.
I used to be trans. Errr... a crossdresser. I didn't believe in making permanent Changes to my body which I may later regret. (Glad I did that -- I've given it up back now. Pretty much live as a regular het man now)
From what I remember, I certainly did enjoy the times I'd be called "she" or "Miss" or whatever. But I didn't go ape-shit crazy if someone didn't. That part is disturbing.
See, I've had surgeries and shit done. Lived as a man for years now. I feel awesome. The vast majority of my problems like depression, suicidal thoughts, and panic attacks are gone. Most of these kids just want attention and to be what they would like to consider a rare unicorn. Not realizing they're just faking having a medical condition the same way they'll say they have autism for snowflake points.
It's nice to not be alone. It's one of the reasons why I came here because I don't fit in with the gay community at large AT ALL. I'd be canceled in a second for my beliefs.
Damn, this is the best take on all these social ills that I've read in the fewest amount of words. It explains why this degeneracy has evolved into trying to normalize pedophilia.
Yep. What happened to love and relationships? The luciferians succeeded 95%. It’s all about sex, perversion and waving genitals at others (figuratively). This is what made other large societies fail. Sex and perversion. Personally I don’t want to hear who put their sh1t wherever. It’s time to clean house.
I think you're confusing the causation here. If a person has the nature and nurture required to be gay and not be a faggot then they're likely to be successful.
It's not that women are the problem, it's that weak minded gays and low quality gays end up being faggots. The high quality gays just go about their life normally and don't make their entirely life identity about their sexual preference. They're successful because only quality gays reach this conclusion.
It's no different how generally speaking, the actual successful straight guys also have their life together and aren't degenerate faggots.
A conservative movement should not tolerate sodomy.I don’t hate gay people but I hate the fact that we pander to them despite majority of them hating us and voting against us.God never told us to be cucks.
The white people who hate us are being brainwashed by the same people who rules Weimar Germany.this group hates white christians ever since Rome and they have promised to eradicate them.
Most of the whites at BLM rallies and ANTIFA are jews.you can easily get white liberals if you try and think instead of pandering.Majority of whites vote for conservative issues;Whites vote more conservative than any race in America.
Found the creepy underpants checker . You go around and shine a flashlight in people's bedroom windows don't you . FYI the bible is pretty explicit about how being a self riteous nosy busy body is a sin.
Whoever designed this airport? He needs to be put in charge of entire City Design. Imagine combining the convenience of city with THIS kind of retention of nature even in buildings. And make sure that he has a plot of land for every single dwelling place to maintain, even if it's indoor land, like a front lawn in front of their condos. People who don't have their own land never learn to build or grow for themselves.
And tons of energy to pump tons of water, then suck all that moisture back out of the air so that every area with A/C doesn't drip water from every cool surface.
Let nature live in natural settings, not in a sealed space with millions of human gawkers passing through. This is beautiful in a Liberace chandelier sort of way but these attempts to awe visitors will always be one-upped by time, technological change, decay, or competition.
"Swamp Coolers" have been a thing for a long time in very dry hot desert climates, where you cool by evaporating water and the extra humidiy is fine. It is not so great in a hot and humid climate.
Yeah our swamp cooler works really well. Most the houses out here have them where I'm at. You're right, they work really really good in dry climates right up until you're at the peak of summer where it struggles to keep up. At least from my experience. But that only lasts a little while until the temperatures start going back down.
They're also incredibly simple machines. It's literally just a water pump and an electric motor that spins essentially just a big fan
Singapore got wealthy because they AREN'T China. They have a very free market approach, had a big removal of corruption just about 20-30 years ago, and are a great place for companies to do business if they want the proximity of far east Asia ,don't want to be situated in China, and want really low taxes.
There are a lot of places that are financially tied to China and none of them look like Singapore or Taiwan. They often look the complete opposite since China's primary focus is NOT to spread their political philosophy everywhere but to become the 1 and only global superpower.
You are correct! Singapore's growth has happened in 1 generation and has been the result of 2 actions:
1: Lowering of taxes. In fact, Singapore is definitely more capitalist than the US. They have lower tax rates and fewer social programs.
2: Removal of corruption. 3 decades ago you could find only a few differences between Singapore and the neighboring areas. Now they are huge because they had 1 main politician help root out an immense amount of corruption.
For all the leftist fools that point at China's growth as a sign of socialism succeeding they lack any knowledge about Singapore which is far more capitalist now than the US and is a stunning place.
That place isn't reproducable. American cities are awful. Seriously, the way everything is zoned necessitates a car which puts people below the poverty line. A good city is one that you can walk to a corner shop on the way home from work.
It's nice in theory, and you can have spots like this, but doing it everywhere would be enormously costly. All the upkeep of employees who tend to it, the water for watering, tools, etc. And then the messes that they make with falling needles/leaves/etc. It's a cool place, but it's not really a scalable design.
Singapore is a beautiful place but you are right, you couldn't do this for a large country. But there's also far more GDP and tax revenue a larger country brings in and yet our taxes are squandered on Pakistani gender studies (totally not money laundering!)
Well all of Singapore doesn't even look like that, but Singapore city is also considered the most expensive city in the world. So it's clearly not cheap. Also chewing gum is illegal and drug trafficking is punishable by death. Weird place.
Yes, not all of Singapore looks like that and yes, the city, which is basically most of the country, is expensive to live in... but at least you're getting something out of the price. San Francisco is crap. LA is getting worse and worse, same with New York. All really expensive places. Singapore has one of the most expensive rapid transit systems in the world but at least it works wonderfully... California spent a ton and has now cancelled their rapid transit system. Total failure.
As to their laws, every place has had weird laws. Some stuff may be extreme but look at the tyranny the west is going through right now and tell me that isn't worse.
No place is a utopia and so yes, Singapore isn't perfect for anyone, regardless of your preferences for society. But that doesn't mean they aren't far more well off than most others.
I've never been there, so I speak only from 2nd hand accounts. But I'd largely agree with you. San Fran and NY are expensive to live in and generally suck because of corrupt politicians who are stealing all the money though.
I don't really think every place has weird laws that are comparable to Singapore, but you may disagree.
Why do you have to live in NY or San Fran though? There are lots of other cities that aren't nearly as expensive and are nicer places to live. My only point about Singapore was that these things are costly. I'm not sure why you're stumping so hard for Singapore here.
I don't really think every place has weird laws that are comparable to Singapore, but you may disagree.
Remember, Singapore really is just a city. You can find hundreds across the US with weird laws. Enforcement is a whole other matter entirely too. Take for example US internment camps. Illegal, and the SCOTUS even agreed... yet they deemed it allowable since it was an emergency. Laws on paper are one thing, how they're enforced is another. Buck vs Bell allows the state to involuntarily sterilize someone they deem unfit. Still technically legal. Kicking out poll watchers and continuing to count is illegal. But is it enforced?
You're right. It's costly. And you also have much lower taxes to offset that. Similar cost to San Fran but different output and that's my point. It's expensive but at least you're getting something out of living there. The reason I'm "stumping" for Singapore is they're a free market success story. And a real free market, not like the US still claims to be. Low taxes, minimal social programs. Obviously totally different situation though considering the size and population totals, which is why I mentioned similar US cities.
Too busy over-taxing citizens and businesses and then laundering that money.
The US can and should absolutely have beautiful locations like Singapore does, but Singapore had to go through a dramatic political change to create this kind of beauty.
Firstly, they removed a ton of corruption in their government. Secondly, they lowered taxes to the point where if you want to do business in Asia but want to avoid China at all costs (including not risking Hong Kong -- smart considering what has happened), you go to Singapore.
Singapore doesn't even have many social programs too. It's why they are NEVER used as a success story of a modern culture by socialists --- they're quite possibly the most opposite society currently in existence.
Imagine a society where no one demands special privileges for sexuality and race and instead allows all the greatest minds to focus on science and technology. America is not reaching its full potential because we dedicate more and more intellectual energy fighting idiocy.
A friend of mine is gay and he fucking LOATHES those over dramatic whiney voiced flamboyant fags. And most in his gay circle do too. It's hilarious to hear them make fun of them.
It's so annoying that the whiny fucks dominate the conversation. It used to be that people in the gay community wanted to blend in with everyone else and be treated equal. These new "queers" as they call themselves don't want to blend in, they want to be catered to and exalted. Fuck them.
SC making gay marriage the law of the land was a big mistake. Big moral issues like the definition of marriage should be made by the people, not five lawyers in black robes.
Remember, they were happy to overturn your vote to keep marriage between a man and a woman. But Scotus refuses to protect your vote when it was for Trump...
Come to think of it... they didn't protect your vote for traditional marriage either.
It's like they like finding elements in the Constitution that aren't there: "Dignity," in the case of Obergefell, which at its core was really about money (the desire of an ailing lesbian for her partner to be able to inherit her veteran's benefits).
Doesn't matter, the time for people to stand up and say something about judges overstepping their powers was Roe v Wade. For that court case, I don't give a fuck if someone is pro-abortion or pro-life, the decision those judges made was an absolute farce.
They even created a new term allowed to be used in law with 0 actual definition (their use of the word "health" had absolutely no specifics).
They neither set properly defined precedent for other courts to follow, nor did they apply the currently existing law at the time. They astonishingly failed at BOTH reasons the Supreme Court even exists.
It's not brigading. It's the normal cuckservatives that put women up on a pedestal and women that can't handle anyone that isn't acting like they're God's gift to humanity.
Unpopular opinion: Non-family units do not carry a legacy. Oh... wait... no, that's fact. (You cannot keep maintaining and building on a society when your children do not exist.)
Amen! We left a nice home in an HOA to find an even better home not in an HOA. No one telling us how to trim our bushes or if we can keep our boat the driveway.
Singapore is the way it is now (huge transformation in ~30 years) because they lowered taxes and removed a lot of governmental corruption.
They are a free market success story.
And yes, they have stringent (and most would say excessive) penalties for small things like loitering but utopia doesn't exist and it's a small price to pay for what they've accomplished in an incredibly short period of time.
"Society if it was run by girls and the gays". You mean a bunch of psychotic women trying to kill each other because the only males around have absolutely no interest in them and fighting for their attention/affection?
I wish we could start a one month holiday in the US called “no men month” We go one month without men doing their jobs. You know, fixing roads, building buildings, drilling for oil, driving supply trucks, doing brain surgery, fixing clogged sewage lines, picking up garbage, fighting fires. And let’s just see what society says about men
The problem you'd run into is that men wouldn't do it, because we have to be responsible. We're not women or Democrats and can't afford to let society collapse just to make a point about our feelings. There's no double-man who have the same relationship to us as we have to women and are up there waiting to bail us out like we do to women.
There have been tons of great leaders, artists, and scientists who were gay, like Leonardo da Vinci, Alan Turing, Alexander the Great, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and Oscar Wilde. The world would be a far lesser place if not for their great minds.
The difference is they didn't let their orientation define them to the point that they beat people over the head with it and used victimhood as a weapon. The alphabet soup group are weaponized and have no wish to help society, only tear it down.
She should put up a city of rundown NYC. Then she will have proof of the results she wants. Or chop in Seattle... wait, the Chicago mayor? Perfect example. What delusions these leftists have.
Many years ago I was reading a thread about security guards in prisons. They were discussing which was worse: Men's prisons or Women's prisons.
Apparently, most guards prefer to work in the violent, maximum security men's prisons than any Women's prisons.
Why?
Well, turns out the violence between Men is ritualized.
They shout. They shove. They get in each other's face. Then the punches start.
Point is, you see it coming. You sense it. You can intervene. You can get between them and get them apart.
Women, apparently, don't follow those rituals. You turn your back and all of a sudden she goes from lying on the bunk to jumping onto your back, panther-style, scratching and biting and obeying none of the men's unwritten rules of fighting. You know, below the belt and stuff like that.
Every man has been in some scuffles in his school boy days. (well, maybe, who knows now with the kind of emasculation going on). I imagine even the most swishy of gay men would take a stand if an abusive partner went too far.
Women, I don't know. They might not have that experience.
Although straights beat them by far in raw numbers, lesbians beat everyone in percentages. Gays guys generally don't beat the shit out of each even though men are supposed to be the more violent ones.
Probably the reason lesbians are higher is they don't have a guy (whether it be current boyfriend, ex, friendzoned guy, etc.) to do the fighting for them. Women think and want to carry out violence just as often as men do, but even the most stubborn feminist cannot overrule their subconscious telling them they aren't built for it. That's why a ton of women get men to do it for them. In addition, most women will only get into fights with guys if they think the guy will absolutely not retaliate.
Lesbians do not have the same repertoire built with as many guys and so have less people to manipulate to do the fighting for them. They have to take action with their own hands and against another woman they don't have the subconscious aspect telling them to avoid the fight.
I have more respect for the gay person who is like: "Yeah, I know the norm is man and woman. I tried that, it just doesn't work for me. This might not seem ideal, but it's the best I can do, I'm happier than I've been, and we all do the best we can." There's not a person on earth who doesn't fall under that in one way or another.
But I think the activists got tied into Marxism. "Homosexuality is every bit as good as heterosexuality. It's even better! Every cultural norm of heterosexuality is just some wicked, behind the scenes plot by straight people to bend the world to their whim, and we should rebel against heteronormativity!"
Where... even looking at these two world views, you see one is a person dealing with the hand life dealt them. The other is a person using sexuality to destroy a culture.
There are a number of us who are patriots, though. Believe me. We hate the LGBT alphabet soup probably MORE than straights do, because people think we’re all like them...
Unpopular opinion but gays who aren’t degenerate tweekers or liberal hostages are generally pretty successful. Much easier to focus on your success when you don’t have to deal with females apparently.
My opinion on the matter is that for a healthy, successful society you need a healthy support for the family unit.
However! There is certainly room for people who do not, for whatever reason, fit into that structure. But even those people benefit,either by being raised in a two parent home or by society being stable.
The communist lie is that you have to tear Western civilization apart to make progress.
This^
Aye. Heterosexuality is the Fountain, the lone ecological pillar of civilization. It is the eternal spring from which all societal niches are possible. Defend it, preserve its premier position in the natural order, you enable prosperity, plurality, and freedom, to the extent that freedom can diverge from the norm yet also contribute to the norm from the periphery. Hierarchy can benefit from buttresses which diverge from the center. But choke the spring, implode the well, and eventually all will die. The still water will fester, and the culture will degenerate and then quickly smother itself. That is until a wiser culture moves in to revitalize the desert.
It's not ABOUT degeneracy, it's about freedom and restoring that freedom. As a result, people are free to be LGBT. But the momentum is not about them.
I would distinguish between people who are gay, and people who are immersed in the toxic LGBT pseudo-political-culture.
The comments on this thread are vaguely disturbing. They don't sound like Conservatives at all, they sound like Liberals. When the hell did this forum get onboard with the LGBT crap?
Exactly. We ride choppers, drink, bourbon, eat nails and defend western civilization. We’re not fucking puritans.
WOW.
Beautifully said.
Lone Pillar... Smh...
I'll say this: I'd rather have two dads than one dad and a dead beat, drug addicted welfare queen of a mother (epidemic of women like this).
Lazy, entitled, narcissistic women have been missed by the scrutiny of society because of feminist political correctness.
These types of women are lauded as brave victims of circumstance while being propped up by the system and given preferential treatment in court and in welfare/housing benefits.
Meanwhile their character couldn't be a better example of degeneracy with their promiscuity and drug habits being framed as "empowering" by the mainstream culture.
Once being a lazy crackhead with seven kids from seven men is no longer socially acceptable we might start to steer our society back in the right direction but we still will have a long way to go.
Feminism has elevated women to the position of being a set of glorified holes on a human body whose purpose is to solicit validation from men enslaved to their carnal drives, all in the name of “empowerment”.
Let me sum that up:
Women created the patriarchy (don’t believe me? Go to a sorority house and watch them enforce appearance standards before a formal “you can’t wear that dress”) because without the patriarchy, women are essentially feral.
Don't portray them as victims, it's abhorrent.
Welfare + stupid crazy high child support, them skanks got it made. Courts need to stop punishing the male, who the fuck needs 1200/month for one child, ho be rolling around in a new car every two years and the child is dressed like a bum.
I used to work with this skank who had 4 kids by 2 or 3 different guys, none of the dad's around, who would openly admit that she got so much child support and public assistance that she didn't need to work, and the only reason she even worked part time was because she was bored.
Government has set her up so well that she doesn't have any need or desire to have a man around to help raise her kids, and she has so much leisure time on her hands that she can't stand it.
There is nothing noble or even necessary about building a system like this. It's not by and large saving starving kids or helpless single moms like we're all led to believe. It just lets lazy, irresponsible people continue to be lazy and irresponsible.
After the second bastard, the hos should be sterilized.
two dads?
I've been friends with wonderful gay men. But none of them were "dad" types, and some of them were very, very unstable.
That guy hates his butthole
My wife recently pushed me to try 'p' spot toys. Gay or not, there's alot of pleasure to be found in the booty
No 'not' about it, that's very gay.
Apologies about my previous comment, I was feeling a bit... "psychotic", is the best I could describe it, even though I am an empathetic person, but now that I'm thinking rationally again, past accounts show that not all guys have a 'p' spot or they get no sexual pleasure whatsoever even if it's directly stimulated. Fully grown men have been raped throughout history, and there are some accounts where they feel no major orgasm coming from there, even though it's said that said spot makes it happen upon sufficient contact. There are men who have gone swimming in rivers and have had things go up their nether regions, and even though said creatures went up a little over past their 'p' spot area, they didn't get anything from it, so that leads me to conclude that some guys are blessed/cursed (depending on how you look at it) with having receptive prostates, while other guys are not. I know that I am one of the latter because there have been times post-puberty where I was constipated, so I repeatedly stuck 1-2 fingers up there to "clear it out", even with some cream that's said to help me get it out and with a baby wipe around them, and I got as many sexual feelings as picking my nose gives me, which is absolute 0.
Not gay if it's between a man and a woman. Words have meanings, and since we're not the left, we should respect them.
(Unless you mean gay as in derogatory, which is also an established and fair-use meaning, but given the potential for confusion here, it'd be best to insult prostate stimulation another way, since buttsex IS primary preferred by gay guys, due to lack of other venue.)
Debatable. If you're able to be pleased then the male member, then it's possible it could be "homo" if you're able to be pleased in homosexual sex. But even if it's not and you only partner up with an actual woman, you are, at the very least, a "bottom."
And right after that, I'm going to save the Republic!
Faggot
False choice.
If we agree we want to interfere with how kids are raised, and I'm not sure we should, then it should be to encourage the nuclear family and strong community bound by family and cultural affinity. I.e. the same model that has worked fine the world over for millennia
We should be discouraging the welfare queen model, not encouraging odd parenting models.
The interference isn't explicit; nobody except psycho Marxists want to directly take children as wards of the state. The problem is incentivization: you get more of what you pay for (or tax less), and vice-versa. Cultural propaganda acts as a multiplier for these negative outcomes (for society as a whole, but of course benefitting those who want dominion over a servile, dependent population).
Sounds like a leftist false choice to me.
And if a positive whole family unit, how does that fair in your choice based analysis?
The point of this post is that they think there is some magical 🦄 utopia where the government loves you like the parent you never had. And then the government makes all the hard decisions for you and everything is beautiful and fantastical and best of all, FREE so you don't have to get up and go do hard work every day. Mental disorder.
Welfare is soul destroying and addictive. Work, being productive, is essential for self esteem. Welfare queens and kangs hate themselves and everybody else. They should be put in the first line for Bill Gates sterlilization/ vaccination.
"I hate NWO forced sterilization unless it happens to people I don't like"
Holy shit what is happening here. This is not conservative. This is not Trump's position. This is just pure nihilism hiding behind a paper-thin mask. Do you have actual political beliefs or are you just a misanthrope?
Take the lump of wood out of your own eye ..
Being a tranny or what ever they chose to be called is up to them on how they live their lives. FORCING everyone to speak a certain way or believe a certain thing to enforce their beliefs in who they are, is just hypocrisy. Eliminating everyones right to their own belife is inhuman and ignorant. Their "you have to do x, y, z so I feel accepted" BS is inhuman.
Tranny here. I agree and endorse this comment. Lmao. Leave me alone and I'll leave you alone. It's that easy.
That is the greatest truth that has lead to this point. People need to live and let live. Leave the children out of it, if people are not 100% the same...so be it. It's part of what makes America great.
“Live and Let live” was mostly for taxes and religious freedom among Christians but modern libertarians peverted that term and use it to justify all forms of degeneracy existing. A society should have a line between freedom and order.
Epic username.
Thanks! I think it's pretty funny.
And you should be free to feel that way(I agree].
Is there a condition that makes you hate your genitals enough to get them lopped off? Sure, plausible. But in that case it's a mental disorder that should be treated with meds and/or therapy. Transitioning seems to rarely help.
That being said, adults can do what they please in my book. Likewise I am entitled to my own beliefs.
I mean there are a lot of REAL trans who literally are women, with a dick, or vice versa.
Then there are the weebs who want to be an anime girl.
I imagine they're less visible because they make less of a fuss. It's almost like if you're not an asshole practically no one cares.
There really, really aren't. This is the Overton Window in play folks, so let's take this moment to shine a spotlight directly on it.
Once they get hacked, they can never go back. Most change their “minds” too.
Should of thought it through to testicles ago. Surprised what people will do for a fad.
Most genuine trannies don't want to cut their dicks off, most trannies are gay, duh, and love their dicks.
No xir lol
This 👏
And that's exactly how Trump feels too. He has been crystal clear about the fact that he has no issue with gay people as long as they are also Patriots.
I think those types don’t identify as LGBTQABCD they probably just do what they do and be normal. Imagine telling everyone you’re hetero all the time that would be weird
The gays that I know don't like all of the letter people either.
It takes power or uniqueness away from them as silly as it sounds. Coming out of the closet was seen as brave to which society was fine with it. Now you have deranged trans and these moronic people with ridiculous pronouns in their same group which makes them look bad. Society doesn't give a shit if you're gay and mind your own business. We care if you put a burden on everyone else.
One guy said he doesn't like being lumped in with pedos
4chan prank or not, I will never support the rainbow alphabet soup after the MAP thing started.
I'm a homo in tech, and trannies have made it where it's "the new normal" to state your damned pronouns on your profiles. I still refuse to do it. It's completely asinine that I have to state the obvious just because a tiny, tiny segment of the population demands it.
Can confirm. Am gay, hate like 90% of the gay community. In that 90% are 10% transtrenders" and the 80% of people who enable them.
Preach friend. Fellow gay and trans person. I hate the LGBT community almost entirely. And all of these fake transtrenders running around making my life harder than necessary. It's exhausting.
Busy Phillips pouts at this comment
I used to be trans. Errr... a crossdresser. I didn't believe in making permanent Changes to my body which I may later regret. (Glad I did that -- I've given it up back now. Pretty much live as a regular het man now)
From what I remember, I certainly did enjoy the times I'd be called "she" or "Miss" or whatever. But I didn't go ape-shit crazy if someone didn't. That part is disturbing.
See, I've had surgeries and shit done. Lived as a man for years now. I feel awesome. The vast majority of my problems like depression, suicidal thoughts, and panic attacks are gone. Most of these kids just want attention and to be what they would like to consider a rare unicorn. Not realizing they're just faking having a medical condition the same way they'll say they have autism for snowflake points.
It's nice to not be alone. It's one of the reasons why I came here because I don't fit in with the gay community at large AT ALL. I'd be canceled in a second for my beliefs.
If you're going to DC let me know! You can join my group of fellow based homos.
I don't trust anyone who builds their entire personality around their love of genitalia.
Damn, this is the best take on all these social ills that I've read in the fewest amount of words. It explains why this degeneracy has evolved into trying to normalize pedophilia.
Gay here. I've said it so many times. I do not identify nor do I like the LGBT community. My sexuality does not define me.
I know some gay men who are 100% pro-Trump. They are not attention seekers.
Yep. What happened to love and relationships? The luciferians succeeded 95%. It’s all about sex, perversion and waving genitals at others (figuratively). This is what made other large societies fail. Sex and perversion. Personally I don’t want to hear who put their sh1t wherever. It’s time to clean house.
I think you're confusing the causation here. If a person has the nature and nurture required to be gay and not be a faggot then they're likely to be successful.
It's not that women are the problem, it's that weak minded gays and low quality gays end up being faggots. The high quality gays just go about their life normally and don't make their entirely life identity about their sexual preference. They're successful because only quality gays reach this conclusion.
It's no different how generally speaking, the actual successful straight guys also have their life together and aren't degenerate faggots.
Take that bullshit out of here.
A conservative movement should not tolerate sodomy.I don’t hate gay people but I hate the fact that we pander to them despite majority of them hating us and voting against us.God never told us to be cucks.
Please articulate what exactly is wrong with oral or anal sex, you sweet summer child
...
You mean the two organs that are for releasing waste? You don't think there is something wrong with putting your mouth to those parts?
Oral is understandable. But you’re a retard if you think anal is “good”.
It is degenerate and gross.it also leads to higher spread of diseases.
And then these people ask "why are they pushing this onto my children"
Because you are tolerating it moron.
The white people who hate us are being brainwashed by the same people who rules Weimar Germany.this group hates white christians ever since Rome and they have promised to eradicate them. Most of the whites at BLM rallies and ANTIFA are jews.you can easily get white liberals if you try and think instead of pandering.Majority of whites vote for conservative issues;Whites vote more conservative than any race in America.
Found the creepy underpants checker . You go around and shine a flashlight in people's bedroom windows don't you . FYI the bible is pretty explicit about how being a self riteous nosy busy body is a sin.
Sodomy is both a sin against God and Man.
Agreed
Acceptance of gay by the left made this possible, ironically, but like everything the left does, they go too far and for the wrong reasons.
Social acceptance of gays has made transgender and pedo the new attention seeking frontier.
Conservatives here love degeneracy as far as it is legal and not distrusting their child.it is not a good mindset.
Probably feels good to be #metoo proof.
You can just identify as a masculine presenting transgender lesbian. It’s indistinguishable from a straight male
Married to a femme lesbian
Can confirm, wasted way too much productivity on preventing myself talking to or being alone with a woman at the office.
It must be great being part of a victim group and not having to worry about being the latest person they scalp for fun.
Had gay neighbors. They flew a Trump flag in their yard. They were cool.
Whoever designed this airport? He needs to be put in charge of entire City Design. Imagine combining the convenience of city with THIS kind of retention of nature even in buildings. And make sure that he has a plot of land for every single dwelling place to maintain, even if it's indoor land, like a front lawn in front of their condos. People who don't have their own land never learn to build or grow for themselves.
And tons of energy to pump tons of water, then suck all that moisture back out of the air so that every area with A/C doesn't drip water from every cool surface.
Let nature live in natural settings, not in a sealed space with millions of human gawkers passing through. This is beautiful in a Liberace chandelier sort of way but these attempts to awe visitors will always be one-upped by time, technological change, decay, or competition.
"Swamp Coolers" have been a thing for a long time in very dry hot desert climates, where you cool by evaporating water and the extra humidiy is fine. It is not so great in a hot and humid climate.
Yeah our swamp cooler works really well. Most the houses out here have them where I'm at. You're right, they work really really good in dry climates right up until you're at the peak of summer where it struggles to keep up. At least from my experience. But that only lasts a little while until the temperatures start going back down.
They're also incredibly simple machines. It's literally just a water pump and an electric motor that spins essentially just a big fan
Ok, but by “cool” they meant “not die of heat stroke”. That shit was still uncomfortable.
Have been to Singapore airport a few times and behind the glitz it's very shoddy and lots of areas stink of damp and mold.
Singapore got wealthy because they AREN'T China. They have a very free market approach, had a big removal of corruption just about 20-30 years ago, and are a great place for companies to do business if they want the proximity of far east Asia ,don't want to be situated in China, and want really low taxes.
There are a lot of places that are financially tied to China and none of them look like Singapore or Taiwan. They often look the complete opposite since China's primary focus is NOT to spread their political philosophy everywhere but to become the 1 and only global superpower.
Singapore isn’t tied to the CCP at all lol
You are correct! Singapore's growth has happened in 1 generation and has been the result of 2 actions:
1: Lowering of taxes. In fact, Singapore is definitely more capitalist than the US. They have lower tax rates and fewer social programs.
2: Removal of corruption. 3 decades ago you could find only a few differences between Singapore and the neighboring areas. Now they are huge because they had 1 main politician help root out an immense amount of corruption.
For all the leftist fools that point at China's growth as a sign of socialism succeeding they lack any knowledge about Singapore which is far more capitalist now than the US and is a stunning place.
Singaporeans are super based. They’re not dissimilar to Taiwanese people!
That place isn't reproducable. American cities are awful. Seriously, the way everything is zoned necessitates a car which puts people below the poverty line. A good city is one that you can walk to a corner shop on the way home from work.
American cities mostly focused on the automobile.
Damn Bro...You just hurt the feelings of civnat cucks on this site.
It's nice in theory, and you can have spots like this, but doing it everywhere would be enormously costly. All the upkeep of employees who tend to it, the water for watering, tools, etc. And then the messes that they make with falling needles/leaves/etc. It's a cool place, but it's not really a scalable design.
Singapore is a beautiful place but you are right, you couldn't do this for a large country. But there's also far more GDP and tax revenue a larger country brings in and yet our taxes are squandered on Pakistani gender studies (totally not money laundering!)
Well all of Singapore doesn't even look like that, but Singapore city is also considered the most expensive city in the world. So it's clearly not cheap. Also chewing gum is illegal and drug trafficking is punishable by death. Weird place.
Yes, not all of Singapore looks like that and yes, the city, which is basically most of the country, is expensive to live in... but at least you're getting something out of the price. San Francisco is crap. LA is getting worse and worse, same with New York. All really expensive places. Singapore has one of the most expensive rapid transit systems in the world but at least it works wonderfully... California spent a ton and has now cancelled their rapid transit system. Total failure.
As to their laws, every place has had weird laws. Some stuff may be extreme but look at the tyranny the west is going through right now and tell me that isn't worse.
No place is a utopia and so yes, Singapore isn't perfect for anyone, regardless of your preferences for society. But that doesn't mean they aren't far more well off than most others.
I've never been there, so I speak only from 2nd hand accounts. But I'd largely agree with you. San Fran and NY are expensive to live in and generally suck because of corrupt politicians who are stealing all the money though.
I don't really think every place has weird laws that are comparable to Singapore, but you may disagree.
Why do you have to live in NY or San Fran though? There are lots of other cities that aren't nearly as expensive and are nicer places to live. My only point about Singapore was that these things are costly. I'm not sure why you're stumping so hard for Singapore here.
Remember, Singapore really is just a city. You can find hundreds across the US with weird laws. Enforcement is a whole other matter entirely too. Take for example US internment camps. Illegal, and the SCOTUS even agreed... yet they deemed it allowable since it was an emergency. Laws on paper are one thing, how they're enforced is another. Buck vs Bell allows the state to involuntarily sterilize someone they deem unfit. Still technically legal. Kicking out poll watchers and continuing to count is illegal. But is it enforced?
You're right. It's costly. And you also have much lower taxes to offset that. Similar cost to San Fran but different output and that's my point. It's expensive but at least you're getting something out of living there. The reason I'm "stumping" for Singapore is they're a free market success story. And a real free market, not like the US still claims to be. Low taxes, minimal social programs. Obviously totally different situation though considering the size and population totals, which is why I mentioned similar US cities.
It is. It's is a very nice place.
I had the same though, but https://youtu.be/x7sAAGlyCtQ?t=317
Too busy over-taxing citizens and businesses and then laundering that money.
The US can and should absolutely have beautiful locations like Singapore does, but Singapore had to go through a dramatic political change to create this kind of beauty.
Firstly, they removed a ton of corruption in their government. Secondly, they lowered taxes to the point where if you want to do business in Asia but want to avoid China at all costs (including not risking Hong Kong -- smart considering what has happened), you go to Singapore.
Singapore doesn't even have many social programs too. It's why they are NEVER used as a success story of a modern culture by socialists --- they're quite possibly the most opposite society currently in existence.
This is one of his greatest hits.
Yeeeeaah let's let emotion driven women and people with mental problems run the country... Wait,.. aren't we doing that right now?
Women running the country equals...
insert picture of CHAZ here
"What about CHOP?"
that would be society if it was run by trans
One of my coworkers is gay , and we travel regularly to Singapore for business
nobody bothers him because he doesn't walk around in assless chaps.
All chaps are assless. That's why you were them over your pants..
Imagine a society where no one demands special privileges for sexuality and race and instead allows all the greatest minds to focus on science and technology. America is not reaching its full potential because we dedicate more and more intellectual energy fighting idiocy.
I believe that is by design
hashtag owned
I'm gay and I wish most gays weren't such faggots.
A friend of mine is gay and he fucking LOATHES those over dramatic whiney voiced flamboyant fags. And most in his gay circle do too. It's hilarious to hear them make fun of them.
It's so annoying that the whiny fucks dominate the conversation. It used to be that people in the gay community wanted to blend in with everyone else and be treated equal. These new "queers" as they call themselves don't want to blend in, they want to be catered to and exalted. Fuck them.
SC making gay marriage the law of the land was a big mistake. Big moral issues like the definition of marriage should be made by the people, not five lawyers in black robes.
Remember, they were happy to overturn your vote to keep marriage between a man and a woman. But Scotus refuses to protect your vote when it was for Trump...
Come to think of it... they didn't protect your vote for traditional marriage either.
It's like they don't like voting.
It's like they like finding elements in the Constitution that aren't there: "Dignity," in the case of Obergefell, which at its core was really about money (the desire of an ailing lesbian for her partner to be able to inherit her veteran's benefits).
Doesn't matter, the time for people to stand up and say something about judges overstepping their powers was Roe v Wade. For that court case, I don't give a fuck if someone is pro-abortion or pro-life, the decision those judges made was an absolute farce.
They even created a new term allowed to be used in law with 0 actual definition (their use of the word "health" had absolutely no specifics).
They neither set properly defined precedent for other courts to follow, nor did they apply the currently existing law at the time. They astonishingly failed at BOTH reasons the Supreme Court even exists.
Thats a big leak in the roof
Just leaving this here.
It's not brigading. It's the normal cuckservatives that put women up on a pedestal and women that can't handle anyone that isn't acting like they're God's gift to humanity.
Unpopular opinion: Non-family units do not carry a legacy. Oh... wait... no, that's fact. (You cannot keep maintaining and building on a society when your children do not exist.)
Very true. Also true is that many family units produce legacies that deteriorate society.
This is also true.
The battle against dark is constant and history always repeats itself.
Let us leave behind symbols so the future may have a chance; like we have.
Singapore is what happens when you let your local HOA take over the government. Sure, it looks pretty, but I wouldn't want to live there.
Amen! We left a nice home in an HOA to find an even better home not in an HOA. No one telling us how to trim our bushes or if we can keep our boat the driveway.
Singapore is the way it is now (huge transformation in ~30 years) because they lowered taxes and removed a lot of governmental corruption.
They are a free market success story.
And yes, they have stringent (and most would say excessive) penalties for small things like loitering but utopia doesn't exist and it's a small price to pay for what they've accomplished in an incredibly short period of time.
LOL, good analogy!
"Society if it was run by girls and the gays". You mean a bunch of psychotic women trying to kill each other because the only males around have absolutely no interest in them and fighting for their attention/affection?
Among many other reasons
45% of gay men support trump. And i think thats a conservative number.
I wish we could start a one month holiday in the US called “no men month” We go one month without men doing their jobs. You know, fixing roads, building buildings, drilling for oil, driving supply trucks, doing brain surgery, fixing clogged sewage lines, picking up garbage, fighting fires. And let’s just see what society says about men
The problem you'd run into is that men wouldn't do it, because we have to be responsible. We're not women or Democrats and can't afford to let society collapse just to make a point about our feelings. There's no double-man who have the same relationship to us as we have to women and are up there waiting to bail us out like we do to women.
We are living in a world run girls and gays, it’s crumbling.
If women ran society, we'd still be in caves.
Men literally invented EVERYTHING, and still do for the most part.
Yup, All roofs would leak like this. and nothing else would work either.
Hahaha
If society were run by the “girls and gays” it would look like the south side of Chicago
There have been tons of great leaders, artists, and scientists who were gay, like Leonardo da Vinci, Alan Turing, Alexander the Great, Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky and Oscar Wilde. The world would be a far lesser place if not for their great minds.
The difference is they didn't let their orientation define them to the point that they beat people over the head with it and used victimhood as a weapon. The alphabet soup group are weaponized and have no wish to help society, only tear it down.
She should put up a city of rundown NYC. Then she will have proof of the results she wants. Or chop in Seattle... wait, the Chicago mayor? Perfect example. What delusions these leftists have.
Not trying to be mean here.... is it common for gay couples to sort of split into masculine / feminine roles? It seems to.
I notice lesbians divide themselves into the "butch" and "Femme" (masculine / feminine acting). Two feminine is not as common as it is in, say, porn.
It seems that even in defiance of heterosexuality, obedience to its norms is made.
Many years ago I was reading a thread about security guards in prisons. They were discussing which was worse: Men's prisons or Women's prisons.
Apparently, most guards prefer to work in the violent, maximum security men's prisons than any Women's prisons.
Why?
Well, turns out the violence between Men is ritualized.
They shout. They shove. They get in each other's face. Then the punches start.
Point is, you see it coming. You sense it. You can intervene. You can get between them and get them apart.
Women, apparently, don't follow those rituals. You turn your back and all of a sudden she goes from lying on the bunk to jumping onto your back, panther-style, scratching and biting and obeying none of the men's unwritten rules of fighting. You know, below the belt and stuff like that.
Every man has been in some scuffles in his school boy days. (well, maybe, who knows now with the kind of emasculation going on). I imagine even the most swishy of gay men would take a stand if an abusive partner went too far.
Women, I don't know. They might not have that experience.
Probably the reason lesbians are higher is they don't have a guy (whether it be current boyfriend, ex, friendzoned guy, etc.) to do the fighting for them. Women think and want to carry out violence just as often as men do, but even the most stubborn feminist cannot overrule their subconscious telling them they aren't built for it. That's why a ton of women get men to do it for them. In addition, most women will only get into fights with guys if they think the guy will absolutely not retaliate.
Lesbians do not have the same repertoire built with as many guys and so have less people to manipulate to do the fighting for them. They have to take action with their own hands and against another woman they don't have the subconscious aspect telling them to avoid the fight.
That's big of you.
I have more respect for the gay person who is like: "Yeah, I know the norm is man and woman. I tried that, it just doesn't work for me. This might not seem ideal, but it's the best I can do, I'm happier than I've been, and we all do the best we can." There's not a person on earth who doesn't fall under that in one way or another.
But I think the activists got tied into Marxism. "Homosexuality is every bit as good as heterosexuality. It's even better! Every cultural norm of heterosexuality is just some wicked, behind the scenes plot by straight people to bend the world to their whim, and we should rebel against heteronormativity!"
Where... even looking at these two world views, you see one is a person dealing with the hand life dealt them. The other is a person using sexuality to destroy a culture.
That is possibly the most ridiculous BTFO I've seen in awhile. Doesn't matter what your position is.
I so wish to see the salt in the replies to that tweet.
Strength is our strength.
It’s a beautiful piece of architecture and design
There are a number of us who are patriots, though. Believe me. We hate the LGBT alphabet soup probably MORE than straights do, because people think we’re all like them...
should be a photo of the Seattle Autonomous Zone under her post.
homosexuals are relatively often very creative - the extra dose of torment caused by the mental illness is the secret stimuli ingredient.
Identity politics belongs in the trashbin of history. Utter garbage
The only difference in the picture would be a giant penis Monument underneath that waterfall. And lots of filth. Detritus. Shit.
Who knew Singapore had it right.
Isn’t that something? Illegal to be gay.
I feel like I’m living in 2008 or something.
No such society has ever or will ever exist because it would be destroyed by cattiness and failed systems.
I like gays like Milo. He's really smart. And he can take a joke like he can take a black dick up his ass
Touché
Deep down gays hate themselves and thats why they are drunks and drug users. You can turn away from sin. God allows U turns.
They would engineer buildings with massive GAPES in the ceiling.
Why was the first tweet dogging on that picture? That's gorgeous.
Non news
LBGMNOP are dumb AF. Der.