There's plenty of ways to circumvent the constitution.
Politicians pass an unconstitutional law. It takes a few years for someone to challenge it then have the process play out in the courts. If it gets declared unconstitutional they'll just pass a similar law with slightly different wording and wait for someone to challenge it again.
This is how leftist states keep unconstitutional gun bans in place.
And just how is this rule going to survive a court challenge on First Amendment grounds?
Turns out the Constitution is just a suggestion as we have seen
Consitution is toilet paper.
Until the 6th.
It doesn’t infringe on anyone’s rights, it’s guidelines for House Members. So there really isn’t a person who could challenge it in court.
It’s stupid, but has no practical effect.
There's plenty of ways to circumvent the constitution.
Politicians pass an unconstitutional law. It takes a few years for someone to challenge it then have the process play out in the courts. If it gets declared unconstitutional they'll just pass a similar law with slightly different wording and wait for someone to challenge it again.
This is how leftist states keep unconstitutional gun bans in place.