Each and every person on earth is wrong on some point, each and every single day."
None of us are perfectly right, 100% of the time.
Being legally unassailable for defamation, like O'Keefe and Assange have been in their chief areas, is a different matter.
Yet, well-respected Sundance over at CT has been wrong a few times
I will cede your point for the sake of the LARPing conversation - neither of these two are LARPs, and neither have been wrong in their broadcasts concerning what Deep State is doing.
Then there's Gateway Pundit, True Pundit, and a host of others...who do have lots of hyperbole and sensationalism issues. Still doesn't stop the 'Pedes here from posting their links at all.
I guess my point is that just because Maximus has been wrong before, doesn't mean he's wrong here. Stating "well, they've been wrong so much" comes across like a "Consider the Source" logical fallacy.
I would that every journalist, vlogger, blogger, etc. strive to achieve a similar status as O'Keefe and Assange
Well I am saying a few times to be kind. He is wrong 50% of the time. There are a few notable people who have had to set him straight. But at this time he is not a bankable outlet. He repeats rumors at best.
Your defensive position of this guy is interesting.
At a crucial time, Carlson showed whose side he was on, and it wasnt ours. He is trying to walk things back now, because the plummeting numbers will cost him his cushy gig. In all honesty, I wasnt a big fan before. Now he just doesnt matter anymore. It kind of makes me wonder about that whole, "someone stole the Hunter Biden laptop info!!" fiasco.
If you can name one public figure in the last 25 yrs who's been right 100% of the time...
Not to be snarky, but I'll wait.
Everyone is human. Concentrating on the point, "Well they've been wrong, too!" really isn't a display of intellectual genius.
Each and every person on earth is wrong on some point, each and every single day.
That includes you and me as well.
Anyone who says for someone to prove something and then says "I'll wait" intends to be snarky.
O'Keefe....
Assange
None of us are perfectly right, 100% of the time.
Being legally unassailable for defamation, like O'Keefe and Assange have been in their chief areas, is a different matter.
Yet, well-respected Sundance over at CT has been wrong a few times
I will cede your point for the sake of the LARPing conversation - neither of these two are LARPs, and neither have been wrong in their broadcasts concerning what Deep State is doing.
Then there's Gateway Pundit, True Pundit, and a host of others...who do have lots of hyperbole and sensationalism issues. Still doesn't stop the 'Pedes here from posting their links at all.
I guess my point is that just because Maximus has been wrong before, doesn't mean he's wrong here. Stating "well, they've been wrong so much" comes across like a "Consider the Source" logical fallacy.
I would that every journalist, vlogger, blogger, etc. strive to achieve a similar status as O'Keefe and Assange
One can hope Maximus can do so one day.
Well I am saying a few times to be kind. He is wrong 50% of the time. There are a few notable people who have had to set him straight. But at this time he is not a bankable outlet. He repeats rumors at best.
Your defensive position of this guy is interesting.
That's kind of why I want to give Tucker a second chance after Trump is inaugurated again.
Not before, but after.
At a crucial time, Carlson showed whose side he was on, and it wasnt ours. He is trying to walk things back now, because the plummeting numbers will cost him his cushy gig. In all honesty, I wasnt a big fan before. Now he just doesnt matter anymore. It kind of makes me wonder about that whole, "someone stole the Hunter Biden laptop info!!" fiasco.