Five SC justices who already threw cold water on the election challenges, and if they follow the 1876 commission example, they'd have two conservatives picked by Republicans, two liberals picked by Democrats, and one picked by the four justices (probably Roberts).
Five SC justices who already threw cold water on the election challenges, and if they follow the 1876 commission example, they'd have two conservatives picked by Republicans, two liberals picked by Democrats, and one picked by the four justices (probably Roberts).
Does anyone really think this is a good idea?