4358
Comments (291)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Fractional 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree that we should not be distracted, but don't personally believe that there is anything to gain from manipulating the data stream.... IF audits are requested, and by all means they should expect it, they would not be able to fix their data streams with material stuff....

I think the story is much more simpler, manual adjudication and mass mail-in. Does not need to be any more complicated than that.

1
illmatic_diplomat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your last point is what focus should be kept on. Physical ballots. They weren’t messing around this year and used every trick in the book.

How I see the whole manipulation of data stream was targeted key areas. With a number of intents. IMO at this time, more of a crutch to micro mask load balances, within a control limit to hit desired spec. tolerance to ensure undetected result outcome. This of course would be based on number control variables planned for self adjustments system would account for over time. But I think that’s where things broke down due to Trump up big and update was needed to finish the game so timeout was taken to setup next play.

But this is where I think they also overplayed their hand cause it was too obvious. And so they ran wild with the manual adjudication process. Ballot stuffing generally is best used when leads are thin to avoid it being obvious and questioned. I think this where our data manipulation was helping.

To a degree panic prob. Ensued with the boots to capture victory given the time left and ground to makeup. Thus, reverting to the clear difference maker they’ve come to know very well in the dominion suite (w/ or w/o) the micro masking of data stream. They had an endless fuel supply to keep machines running on their own and were hell bent to make it happen at any cost. Cranked that vote distribution to max fraud setting and never looked back.