We have seen these assertions fall by the wayside the more this thing drags on.
First, it was 'the election winner is whoever the media claims it is', and then it was anonymous 'official sources have claimed' and then finally the dialectic was dragged kicking and screaming to look at electoral votes and recount audits and testimony of fraud sufficient to invalidate masses of illegal ballots.
So the same thing applies here, crime isnt green-lit because the media doesn't mention it. Arguably if media isnt covering news honestly, they arent even media any longer.
Can someone please tell me what the other side's counter argument is to these irregularities?
YoU LoSt TrUmPTaRd. You’re losing cases!! Um no they won’t even hear the cases
LMFAO. You are looking at court cases? Okay. You ever read and try to understand the constitution. Apparently not.
I responded to his question. That’s their response.
Ouch. Hahaha
I believe you're seeing this differently than mine.. he's answering to the pede he replied to...
They're largely ignorant of these facts. The mainstream media isn't talking about it.
We have seen these assertions fall by the wayside the more this thing drags on.
First, it was 'the election winner is whoever the media claims it is', and then it was anonymous 'official sources have claimed' and then finally the dialectic was dragged kicking and screaming to look at electoral votes and recount audits and testimony of fraud sufficient to invalidate masses of illegal ballots.
So the same thing applies here, crime isnt green-lit because the media doesn't mention it. Arguably if media isnt covering news honestly, they arent even media any longer.
You are a threat to "democracy" and should be silenced.
WHAT IRREGULARITIES?? THEY SAY...
None. They are just hoping to run out the clock.