29
posted ago by Tintenfass ago by Tintenfass +29 / -0

I think I understand why he is voting against certificstion, unless an audit is done, and it not an underhanded devious reason.

Remember that half the voters by the survey in his statement, even some Republicans and independents, are still not sure there was fraud. These are the people who get their info from MSM and are generally clueless. I think the audit ploy was not to sabotage Trump, but to give a public, undeniable option to look at it for the public just now figuring out something is wrong.

An audit, could without a doubt clear the minds of the undecideds. However, I think Cruz knows the offer will not be taken up for fear of exposing the fraud. All it would take is a little in each state to be revealed for people to believe it was rigged. The floodgates would open.

Now, do I agree with this approach? No. But I can uderstand why it was taken.

Comments (16)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
CamboA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think youre making a good point. Under no circumstances should you assume that your average politician is as informed as your average pede. Do you recall some of the hearings involving Dominion? Most politicians dont even seem to have a clue about very basic networking infrastructure, and the massive potential of fraud that electronic voting machines alone invite. These people need to be force fed facts, and for that, a ten day session with all eyes on them, could very likely change everything.

2
Tintenfass [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is an excellent point regarding how uninformed and ignorant most politicians are. Thanks for bringing that up.