58
posted ago by J_Von_Random +59 / -1

Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given' and ‘lawfully certified' (the statutory requisite), unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.

(emphasis added)

It says the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are all freaking out about. English, Motherfuckers: do you read it?

EDIT: for the smoothbrains in the audience: Everyone has been claiming that Cruz would only reject electors if the 10 day investigation turned up fraud. What he actually said is that he will reject electors, unless they can show that they aren't fraudulent. And this is in a context when Trump is dropping a MOAB on the 6th.....

I can lead you to simple facts. But I can understand them for you...

> Accordingly, we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given' and ‘lawfully certified' (the statutory requisite), ***unless and until*** that emergency 10-day audit is completed. (emphasis added) It says the EXACT OPPOSITE of what you are all freaking out about. English, Motherfuckers: do you read it? EDIT: for the smoothbrains in the audience: Everyone has been claiming that Cruz would only reject electors if the 10 day investigation turned up fraud. What he *actually* said is that he will reject electors, unless they can show that they aren't fraudulent. And this is in a context when Trump is dropping a MOAB on the 6th..... I can lead you to simple facts. But I can understand them for you...
Comments (71)
sorted by:
8
IamQ 8 points ago +8 / -0

What are you all freaking out about?

4
J_Von_Random [S] 4 points ago +8 / -4

The narrative on here for the last day or so has been "Cruz and others won't object until after a ten day investigation". When what they actually say is "we are rejecting these period, unless they are investigated".

6
45semiautosp 6 points ago +6 / -0

and what will this get us anyway. object now or object later. unless dems object in house objections lead nowhere but Biden. Something other than objections is required.

The fear is nobody will be left in DC to pressure these critters or to burn it to the ground, figuratively, in minecraft, after 10 days.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
J_Von_Random [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Literally the opposite of what he said.

To use your scenario: JFK warns the USSR "blockade stays in place until we see there aren't any missiles".

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
J_Von_Random [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

And without those EVs Biden isn't president. The other side are the ones who need to ram this through ASAP.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

The question at hand is that the narrative here has been that he would support the current electors but was asking for an investigation. He is saying the exact opposite.

6
Double_D 6 points ago +6 / -0

People are concerned that the "investigation" will be a sham and just a way to certify the electors 10 days later when most of us will no longer be in DC to pressure them.

-1
J_Von_Random [S] -1 points ago +2 / -3

It is possible that they might think that.

But it will only increase the pressure so why would I worry?

6
Double_D 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s a big difference between “pressure” being applied in angry phone calls and emails and the pressure of hundreds of thousands of Patriots surrounding the Capitol building in person.

If you have no concern that this investigation will be a theatrical sham (you know, like every other congressional “investigation” ever), then I think it speaks more to your naivety than our inability to read English.

-2
J_Von_Random [S] -2 points ago +2 / -4

Use a little imagination: people can show up again ten days later if that were to happen.

If they wouldn't, then they wouldn't do anything so you may as well give up now.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Slenderman 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not about after 10 days. This is about his play on words. Cruz says he will not object until a investigation is done.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
J_Von_Random [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are assuming that they would allow an investigation to happen in the first place.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

They won't get the chance to do that.

None of this is happening in a vacuum. Trump's move is on the 6th as well.

3
Hangemh1gh 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will remain skeptical until proven otherwise. Can't blame a guy for that. Could you?

2
J_Von_Random [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Skeptical I don't mind.

What I mind is the people in here demonstrating cryogenic IQs in refusing to put really simple pieces of data together.

2
Hangemh1gh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair enough.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

2
MajorAppleHead 2 points ago +4 / -2

I’ve seen zero freak out. But ok...

2
J_Von_Random [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ok, so you haven't been on thedonald for the last day. No shame in admitting it.

2
MajorAppleHead 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ooooh you got me.

2
elsabio 2 points ago +2 / -0

You missed this bit. "We are not naïve. We fully expect most if not all Democrats, and perhaps more than a few Republicans, to vote otherwise."

Which means he knows he will lose any vote. Trump knows this also; Trump is not stupid. The trick here is to get state legislators to change their electoral votes and deny Biden a path to 270.

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Didn't miss it, just not the subject at hand.

Also if what is happening is what I think is happening, they will have the votes.

1
elsabio 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, if a dozen or so dems are at GITMO by then, yes, they will have the votes....

2
1
elsabio 1 point ago +1 / -0

I missed that one. Interesting theory, and we live in interesting times.

2
Tcrlaf1 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s called, “ THE 1876 OPTION. All of this has happened before.

1
TheJimmReaper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but isn't it just passing the buck down the road, i mean whats stopping them from not releasing the finding till the summer or later as they've done with all.other reports so far

There are genuine questions pedes have... But sure if you wanna sit on your ass for another 10 days while Communism gets 10 more days to tighen it's grip then go ahead

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like everyone else you are treating this as though it is in a vacuum.

Trump's move is on the 6th. The consistent story from Trump's inner circle is that it will flip hundreds of representatives. Plus you have the Cruz faction saying "no accept till not fraudulent".

It doesn't take a genius to put these facts together. It shouldn't take a >75 IQ to do it. Yet here we are.

1
TheJimmReaper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right okay i get that but

What if the left just ignore the 6th and the courts just ignore the evidence yet again???

Cruz has talked the talk for a long time now yet hasn't actually walked the walk has he... I mean both Jack Dorkey and his robot sex lizard Cuckerberg lied before Congress to Cruz who said he would have them if they did, yet nothing

So if the house & Senate also then just ignore the evidence as Mitch the Bitch & Pelosi have done so far

Then whats the plan???

Not being funny but were 2 weeks from Communism and you wanna keep telling pedes to trust the plan, but don't have a clue as to what plan A is or if theres a plan B

Not dooming, I'm asking a genuine question!!!

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

How to force the issue is an entirely valid question. I think something like this is the plan:

https://thedonald.win/p/11ROCCtZZh/ok-im-making-my-prediction-now/c/

1
TheJimmReaper 1 point ago +1 / -0

So basically the plan is to show evidence once again and watch the left ignore it once again!!!

Great plan only one snag... It hasn't worked the multiple other times it was done, what makes this time any different???

And whats the plan for AFTER if this "new" plan of showing evidence again doesn't work... thats the point I'm making, does everyone think they can just go back to work on the 7th like normal or something

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

sigh

Trump's inner circle has stated in the last week or so that they have massive, undeniable evidence. They have not said what it is, but have made clear that it is the sort of thing which will make any decent person furious and out for blood if they see it.

Problem: the powers that be refuse to look at any evidence, and when it is shoved in their faces they ignore it.

Solution: set up a situation where if they refuse to acknowledge the evidence and act on it they will be in fear of immediate, severe, and personal repercussions.

1
TheJimmReaper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really and you think walking through the capital for a day will scared them???

So what happens if they just ignore the March and go ahead and carry on their steal???

Especially considering as the amount of evidence already is overwhelming & mjnd biggling... Yet still ignored, so whats the plan for after they ignore this latest evidence????

This is the part you've failed to answer, weve slow walked this as far as it can go with trust the plan, what happens IF the plan fails?

Thats what Patruots need to decide, are they going home to Communism or are YOU prepared to lay down YOUR life on the 6th and after... Because if you're not, then what have they got to fear???

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is the part you've failed to answer

No, you just weren't paying attention.

I am assuming evidence bad enough that the politicians recognize that if they don't deal with it they will probably not live to see the end of the day. Something on the order of "we have video of Biden and Kemp gangraping a five year old".

If I'm wrong and this isn't the plan, then you can be sure that Trump has a different way to force the issue. But the issue will be forced one way or another.

1
Coorslight14 1 point ago +2 / -1

Your right. We all REACT to the HEADLINE. The Washington Compost really started that when Trump won.

1
Anticommuniste 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Electoral Commission v2.0 🤩

1
nemonster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Count me in

1
NuclearRocks1 1 point ago +2 / -1

When he says something like ..........

I am joining bla bla Congressman, SIGNING an objection on 1/6

Lying ted the publicity hound

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yep. No English reading ability here....

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
1
Slenderman 1 point ago +1 / -0

True lmao

-2
Slenderman -2 points ago +1 / -3

Cruz is a pos.

0
J_Von_Random [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

[citation needed]

See, if he is backstabbing then he is a POS. But you don't get to say "we know he is backstabbing, because he is a POS, and we know he is a POS because he is backstabbing".

-1
Slenderman -1 points ago +1 / -2

I get to say whatever I want. Hes a rino. No one puts stipulations on their choices. It would be like me saying well if it's nice outside today I'll go to work.

NO - it doesn't matter the weather. I go to work every day because I have a job to do.

0
J_Von_Random [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

No one puts stipulations on their choices. It would be like me saying well if it's nice outside today I'll go to work.

Ok, so you didn't read anything, or aren't capable of comprehending it. Whatever.

-1
Slenderman -1 points ago +1 / -2

I read it enough with your pussy insults.

Hes saying that I wont reject unless I get an audit. How fucking hard is that to understand?

0
J_Von_Random [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hes saying that I wont reject unless I get an audit.

Now you are just a liar. He said the opposite of that.

-1
Slenderman -1 points ago +1 / -2

No look at what you highlighted bird brain.

Unless and until.

What does unless mean to you?

What does until mean to you?

Are you thinking about what you are writing this is not difficult.

1
J_Von_Random [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

"we intend to vote on January 6 to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given' and ‘lawfully certified'"

That means: We are rejecting these.

"unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed."

"Here is how you can prove that they are not fraudulent".

I did read what was there. The claim is that Cruz is default accept but pretty please can we investigate? The reality is that Cruz is default reject unless they show that it isn't fraudulent.

What does unless mean to you?

"Unless you do this we are rejecting the electors"

What does until mean to you?

"Until you do this we are rejecting the electors"