“I've never investigated an innocent person that did not want me to see the evidence they controlled that prove their innocence. And I've never investigated a guilty person who wanted me to see the evidence they controlled that proved their guilt.” - Rudy Giuliani
NB: I caught AFTER the fact that I misspelled adjudication on my title screen - that was an after-the-fact addition that I put in at the last minute and should have spell checked.
It's a simple fact that the automated voting machines put out by companies like Dominion allow for a process called adjudication. On the surface, adjudication seems like a reasonable process, whereby ballots that have a problem are saved and then judged at a later Point by a third-party so that they line up as best as possible with the intent of the voter.
Unfortunately, testimony after testimony has shown that the simply wasn't the case, but nobody shown how simple it would be to shift the vote even just two or 4% in the process of an unmonitored adjudication. So in this short video when I'm going to set out to do is show you first, on an unrelated point, that official ballots were available online and could have been printed in bulk and sent in, which shows the need for forensic auditing of the ballots for kinematic artifacts they can prove their validity or non validity, but I also want to show you an essentially real time what a two to 4% shift in the vote would look like in adjudication. This is a very crude mock-up, but the point is it's very boring and very dull and very dry and easy to miss.
“I've never investigated an innocent person that did not want me to see the evidence they controlled that prove their innocence. And I've never investigated a guilty person who wanted me to see the evidence they controlled that proved their guilt.” - Rudy Giuliani
NB: I caught AFTER the fact that I misspelled adjudication on my title screen - that was an after-the-fact addition that I put in at the last minute and should have spell checked.
It's a simple fact that the automated voting machines put out by companies like Dominion allow for a process called adjudication. On the surface, adjudication seems like a reasonable process, whereby ballots that have a problem are saved and then judged at a later Point by a third-party so that they line up as best as possible with the intent of the voter.
Unfortunately, testimony after testimony has shown that the simply wasn't the case, but nobody shown how simple it would be to shift the vote even just two or 4% in the process of an unmonitored adjudication. So in this short video when I'm going to set out to do is show you first, on an unrelated point, that official ballots were available online and could have been printed in bulk and sent in, which shows the need for forensic auditing of the ballots for kinematic artifacts they can prove their validity or non validity, but I also want to show you an essentially real time what a two to 4% shift in the vote would look like in adjudication. This is a very crude mock-up, but the point is it's very boring and very dull and very dry and easy to miss.