5734
Comments (193)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
LiskaEman 4 points ago +5 / -1

I thought the suits were specifically in relation to the recording of the calls?

19
phibetared 19 points ago +19 / -0

Nope. The twitter post is saying this was supposed to be a confidential negotiation call of an already existing lawsuit. They broke the confidentiality - which may (or may not) have legal consequences.

5
LiskaEman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks for the clarification! I read and reread and still misunderstood what the lawsuits were about!

3
Macho_Maam 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have not assigned a judge to the case. These were filed a while back. Trump makes a reference to that on the call.