Disturbing. Sorry, but no woman should be behind ANY life and death decision making where emotional response results in the later. This is the bullshit that gets people killed and fails a mission.
Was really funny I thought. Dude just bull rushed her and his buddies were ready to beat his ass for that. I'm willing to bet that she told them she could stand up and hold her ground to any one of them. She probably made the challenge and had to back it up. I have to commend her for standing in there and giving it a shot.
I agree men should stay in infantry and combat where they have a natural advantage over women and women should stay as snipers and pilots where they have the natural advantage over men. Let people play to their strengths.
For snipers, women tend to be better at distinguishing different colors and actually see more colors then men, making them great spotters (not necessarily better at taking the shot, but spotters are really important for sniping).
For pilots, women are better at multitasking and can handle more gs than men can because they have lower centers of gravity. They also don't get into dick measuring contests to see how low they can take their bird.
For infantry, strength and endurance is obviously important, and men naturally have more which is why they excel in those roles.
Ideal world you would have them split up as their roles for effectivity, but I dont think there are enough women interested in flying/sniping, so men still have to fill the extra slots.
Where do you rank the importance of emotionless decision making in either of those jobs? Physical endurance is not a factor in a sniper or pilot's role? There are stark physiological differences between both sexes when it comes to this type of work. Lung capacity, bone and muscle structure, larger brain amongst others being huge advantages in a sniper or pilot's job. A sniper doesn't just lay prone in cover outside of enemy lines completely spared of any hazard. There are reason's women haven't filled these rolls in the past and it isn't because of misogyny.
In combat, quite a bit. But 99% of the military never sees combat, so it's less important.
Men's bone and muscle system works against them as pilot. They can't pull as tight of turns at the same speed as women can, and they just can't pay attention to as many different things at once. It's just a physical difference. I work as a test engineer on the F18 training systems. The top 50% of any given class is majority women, even though the class overall is like 70/30 men. The men tend to make better leaders though. Most of the women aren't assertive enough / the men won't listen to. One of my coworkers says he has to constantly tell the women pilots to give commands more assertively or like they expect to be listened to. But when it comes to raw ability the women have the edge.
Men usually have more muscle, and more oxygen is required to sustain those muscles, something not to be taken lightly when your lungs are plastered against your seat (shakiness of a hand due to oxygen deprivation can literally be life or death for a pilot). This, combined with the fact that women have shorter torsos means the distance between the brain and heart is shorter and the heart doesn't have to work as hard to push blood up to the brain. The shorter torso / longer legs also means a smaller percentage of the pilot's body (and blood) is under the full gs, which also lessens the load on the heart. So a combination of these things makes women better at sustaining and enduring high g maneuverers. A man who happens to be short with a short torso and long legs has the same advantage, but it's uncommon, the same way a women with the required strength/endurance for infantry is uncommon.
I thought they can take more Gs because they're shorter and the distance from the heart to bain is shorter so the heart can pump blood to the brain at high Gs.
Correct, women are shorter and usually have shorter torsos and longer legs than men. This lowers their center of gravity (smaller torso / bigger legs => lower c.o.g) and reduces the distance the heart has to pump blood to the brain, as well reducing the portion of the body that takes the full gs. But a man who happens to be short with a short torso/long legs has the same advantage.
Statecraft: If you use women to fight, and you are losing a long-term war. The ability to produce new soldiers for your nation is lowered proportionally to female casualties. In a generational war your side will continuously grow weaker. If the other side has women on the homefront who are giving birth to children, they will make up their war loses and have manpower for industry and further fighting over decades. Even if you win, your smaller population will soon be over-run by the breeding of your vanquished foes and you will be forced to fight again.
This is trying to beat someone at their own game. Women just aren't equipped for combat roles. They need to play their own game. I'm old, so I'm not going to try and physically respell an attacker in a gas station parking lot late at night, I'm just going to shoot them. Play to your strengths.
Ya like I heard engineering schools had lowered the standards for females,
let's look at that Florida bridge that collapsed that had all female engineers and construction company. Look at firefighter, up here in Canada anyway, the women have a lesser weight dead weight and conditions to pass. It's a fucking joke!
Not to mention she becomes a liability because her team will be naturally inclined to protect her BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT MEN ARE WIRED TO DO. Sorry for yelling.
If you slow the video it looks like 2 of the dudes (the referee included) were squaring up to fight the guy. Totally unacceptable this shit is in our military
That is an unfair contest from the get go because most men can’t go a single round with Tyson. Most humans couldn’t take a single punch from him. Male or female.
He let up on her after that first time because people were mad at him.
Mad???
It's fucking war people.
Look at all the fucking white knoghts coming to the damsels side.....cant do this shit when lead is flying. "Equality "
Disturbing. Sorry, but no woman should be behind ANY life and death decision making where emotional response results in the later. This is the bullshit that gets people killed and fails a mission.
Was really funny I thought. Dude just bull rushed her and his buddies were ready to beat his ass for that. I'm willing to bet that she told them she could stand up and hold her ground to any one of them. She probably made the challenge and had to back it up. I have to commend her for standing in there and giving it a shot.
I agree men should stay in infantry and combat where they have a natural advantage over women and women should stay as snipers and pilots where they have the natural advantage over men. Let people play to their strengths.
What advantage over men?
For snipers, women tend to be better at distinguishing different colors and actually see more colors then men, making them great spotters (not necessarily better at taking the shot, but spotters are really important for sniping).
For pilots, women are better at multitasking and can handle more gs than men can because they have lower centers of gravity. They also don't get into dick measuring contests to see how low they can take their bird.
For infantry, strength and endurance is obviously important, and men naturally have more which is why they excel in those roles.
Ideal world you would have them split up as their roles for effectivity, but I dont think there are enough women interested in flying/sniping, so men still have to fill the extra slots.
Where do you rank the importance of emotionless decision making in either of those jobs? Physical endurance is not a factor in a sniper or pilot's role? There are stark physiological differences between both sexes when it comes to this type of work. Lung capacity, bone and muscle structure, larger brain amongst others being huge advantages in a sniper or pilot's job. A sniper doesn't just lay prone in cover outside of enemy lines completely spared of any hazard. There are reason's women haven't filled these rolls in the past and it isn't because of misogyny.
In combat, quite a bit. But 99% of the military never sees combat, so it's less important.
Men's bone and muscle system works against them as pilot. They can't pull as tight of turns at the same speed as women can, and they just can't pay attention to as many different things at once. It's just a physical difference. I work as a test engineer on the F18 training systems. The top 50% of any given class is majority women, even though the class overall is like 70/30 men. The men tend to make better leaders though. Most of the women aren't assertive enough / the men won't listen to. One of my coworkers says he has to constantly tell the women pilots to give commands more assertively or like they expect to be listened to. But when it comes to raw ability the women have the edge.
What specifically about men’s bone and muscle systems works against them. Your statement provides nothing more than an I said so anecdotal response.
Men usually have more muscle, and more oxygen is required to sustain those muscles, something not to be taken lightly when your lungs are plastered against your seat (shakiness of a hand due to oxygen deprivation can literally be life or death for a pilot). This, combined with the fact that women have shorter torsos means the distance between the brain and heart is shorter and the heart doesn't have to work as hard to push blood up to the brain. The shorter torso / longer legs also means a smaller percentage of the pilot's body (and blood) is under the full gs, which also lessens the load on the heart. So a combination of these things makes women better at sustaining and enduring high g maneuverers. A man who happens to be short with a short torso and long legs has the same advantage, but it's uncommon, the same way a women with the required strength/endurance for infantry is uncommon.
I thought they can take more Gs because they're shorter and the distance from the heart to bain is shorter so the heart can pump blood to the brain at high Gs.
Correct, women are shorter and usually have shorter torsos and longer legs than men. This lowers their center of gravity (smaller torso / bigger legs => lower c.o.g) and reduces the distance the heart has to pump blood to the brain, as well reducing the portion of the body that takes the full gs. But a man who happens to be short with a short torso/long legs has the same advantage.
Statecraft: If you use women to fight, and you are losing a long-term war. The ability to produce new soldiers for your nation is lowered proportionally to female casualties. In a generational war your side will continuously grow weaker. If the other side has women on the homefront who are giving birth to children, they will make up their war loses and have manpower for industry and further fighting over decades. Even if you win, your smaller population will soon be over-run by the breeding of your vanquished foes and you will be forced to fight again.
Sounds like nature was on to something from the get go?
This is trying to beat someone at their own game. Women just aren't equipped for combat roles. They need to play their own game. I'm old, so I'm not going to try and physically respell an attacker in a gas station parking lot late at night, I'm just going to shoot them. Play to your strengths.
Women: I want equality! Women as well: I want equality of outcome or you're a sexist, misogynist...racist
Also we want the standards lowered for us because we're equal!
Ya like I heard engineering schools had lowered the standards for females, let's look at that Florida bridge that collapsed that had all female engineers and construction company. Look at firefighter, up here in Canada anyway, the women have a lesser weight dead weight and conditions to pass. It's a fucking joke!
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/10/22/design-error-blamed-florida-international-university-pedestrian-bridge-collapse/2449316001/
Military trains you to break things and kill people.
obama saw to fucking that up.
Kek
Disgusting how many jump to her defense. If you cant take it then dont lower the quality of our forces by enlisting
Edit: after a rewatch, 2 of the white knights actually were squaring up to fight the dude also if you pay attention.
You cant have this shit going on in a war scenario ffs
Not to mention she becomes a liability because her team will be naturally inclined to protect her BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT MEN ARE WIRED TO DO. Sorry for yelling.
If you slow the video it looks like 2 of the dudes (the referee included) were squaring up to fight the guy. Totally unacceptable this shit is in our military
That is an unfair contest from the get go because most men can’t go a single round with Tyson. Most humans couldn’t take a single punch from him. Male or female.
REEEE it’s not fair. He’s bigger than me! REEEEE