1211
Comments (26)
sorted by:
31
DontTreadOnIT 31 points ago +31 / -0

Definitely sounded like Trump was trying to get them on record saying certain things...

24
bombthrowinggenius 24 points ago +24 / -0

Just to be clear. The president already had these two law suits filed. This call was a confidential settlement discussion regarding these two lawsuits. Ol Raffensperger's side leaking the tapes to Wapo is going to fuck them over in these lawsuits. It was a hail mary against Trump because they already know they are fucked. The media is now perpetrating a new phone call hoax that Trump asked him to "find" votes when it was clear Trump was asking him to correct the hundreds of thousands of fraudulent and switched votes.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
11
Cali_kid 11 points ago +11 / -0

The settlement would be that every Maga voter slaps that spineless secretary of state once in the head.

9
TheAntiCommie76 9 points ago +9 / -0

What happened to every conversation with the president is Top Secret?

12
Thetigerpoppy 12 points ago +12 / -0

Even if he wasn't the President this is still a confidential settlement, so whoever leaked this is at a bare minimum in contempt of court along with whatever the particular penalty is for leaking this information. The question is who leaked this, and who's recording is it.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Thetigerpoppy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doubtful since I'd assume everyone there realized at least 1 person was recording (likely each party recorded it though)

But I don't see how 1 can legally leak a confidential settlement discussion the very next day. Itd be 1 thing to talk about what happened but the word confidential has a meaning so leaking the actual conversation is crossing the line.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Thetigerpoppy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just did a bit of research and it looks as though "confidential" is specifically in regards to both parties being unable to use this conversation in court as evedince of anything unless they are making the argument the other party acted in bad faith (to me leaking the conversation to an outlet known to be biased against 1 of the parties seems like a bad faith action, but I'm no laywer or judge)

I know mediations which are more or less the same as this conversation was aren't even subject to discovery in court so the idea a laywer told whoever leaked this that it was A ok to do so is hard to wrap my brain around.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
americanjerky 9 points ago +9 / -0

He risked his career and finances to leak that nothing burger? The deep state is getting desperate!

2
John_McFly 2 points ago +2 / -0

His career is already in the toilet, so just his money.

8
2A_Conservative 8 points ago +8 / -0

Which court is going look at the lawsuits ? Georgia courts ?

8
Donlurker 8 points ago +8 / -0

Get em david

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
Coorslight14 4 points ago +5 / -1

Oh please the courts will not do shit.... Trump has been playing nice, it's time to play hardball if we are still a free country after Jan 20th.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +1 / -7
1
CokeOrPepe 1 point ago +2 / -1

No, removing the 300,000 fraudulent votes is not ‘making up votes’ you moron.

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
4
MaouRem 4 points ago +8 / -4

Waste of time and effort. Any case disputing election results needs to be solved by the Supreme Court which already declared they don't care enough to even look

2
Salty1 2 points ago +3 / -1

(WP) washington post owns the rights. Full call on website.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
BasedInFact 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just to be clear, this matters not at all if the Democrats get away with the steal.

Which they won’t.

1
redpillrising 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump planned this....appear weak when you are strong!