You would not want to know why the government killed them?
Or you think their memory can only be honoured by participating in the coverup story that a bunch of cave people pulled this off without insider assistance?
You are wrong, the controlled demolition charges were so intense that they did melt steel, there are photos of the melted columns, there are photos of the molten steel running down the side of the ruins for days. There are firemen and construction workers talking about the pools of steel beneath the ruins that were white hot and molten for weeks.
If it was a matter of trusses falling away, which it wasn't then the fall would not have been uniform and drastic.
Take the time to read up on the engineering of the building, the heat from plane fuel would have had NO impact on the steel of this building, its japanese steel was extraordinary for its strength and the heat used to create it in the first place
the heat from plane fuel would have had NO impact on the steel of this building
So the steel is magic and just defies the laws of physics? It doesn't matter that it's "japanese steel, extraordinary for its strength and the heat used to create it in the first place" because steel subjected to high enough heat for a long enough period of time will have a reduction in its carrying capacity and under the conditions of the WTC, will fail. You speak authoritatively on a subject that you very obviously have no fucking experience or familiarity with.
I am beginning to think you are intentionally ignorant.
Go check the burn temperature of plane fuel, then check the melting point of the specific Japanese steel used in the towers. Also the plane fuel would have been consumed immediately, not long enough of a time to effect the steel. This of course is specious as there were no planes.
Did you bother to watch the video of building 7 in free fall, did you bother to watch the video of the BBC announcing the fall of building 7 an hour or so before it fell?
As for how the towers and building 7 fell go see the photos of the 45 degree angle cuts on the steel beams, go see the photos of the molten steel that lay in pools beneath the towers for weeks.
These are standard cuts you see with controlled demo. The molten steel shows that the charges set to cut the steel may have been thermite.
The fire doesn't need to continue long enough and hot enough to melt steel, it just needs to burn hot enough and long enough to heat the metal enough that its ultimate failure condition falls below its current loading condition.
The beam does not need to melt at all for this to happen. Heated steel is substantially weaker than steel under normal conditions, and the beams will fail long before they melt under their given conditions. Then you have the crash down events that deliver impulses to all the floors and beams under them well above their load limits and so they fail and it just cascades down the tower.
You can see the molten steel flowing down the remaining columns in streams, the boots of the workers melted from the heat, there was some beneath the rubble but there was also a large open pool in the photos taken at the time. The firefighters discussed it in detail in some videos. There are photos of partially molten beams as well.
Would a kiln effect have contributed to the length of time it remained molten, probably. The first question to ask is what would have driven the steel to such a consistency in the first place.
Once the explosion occurred, all the jet fuel was gone. How did the fire continue long enough and hot enough to melt steel?
It didn't, the place was rigged for controlled demo.
No it wasn't. If I lost friends/family on 9/11, I'd be offended by you even saying shit like that. Keep that in mind.
You would not want to know why the government killed them?
Or you think their memory can only be honoured by participating in the coverup story that a bunch of cave people pulled this off without insider assistance?
Controlled demo, no steel framed building has ever collapsed from fire, ever.
question was for rhino
You are wrong, the controlled demolition charges were so intense that they did melt steel, there are photos of the melted columns, there are photos of the molten steel running down the side of the ruins for days. There are firemen and construction workers talking about the pools of steel beneath the ruins that were white hot and molten for weeks. If it was a matter of trusses falling away, which it wasn't then the fall would not have been uniform and drastic. Take the time to read up on the engineering of the building, the heat from plane fuel would have had NO impact on the steel of this building, its japanese steel was extraordinary for its strength and the heat used to create it in the first place
So the steel is magic and just defies the laws of physics? It doesn't matter that it's "japanese steel, extraordinary for its strength and the heat used to create it in the first place" because steel subjected to high enough heat for a long enough period of time will have a reduction in its carrying capacity and under the conditions of the WTC, will fail. You speak authoritatively on a subject that you very obviously have no fucking experience or familiarity with.
I am beginning to think you are intentionally ignorant.
Go check the burn temperature of plane fuel, then check the melting point of the specific Japanese steel used in the towers. Also the plane fuel would have been consumed immediately, not long enough of a time to effect the steel. This of course is specious as there were no planes.
Did you bother to watch the video of building 7 in free fall, did you bother to watch the video of the BBC announcing the fall of building 7 an hour or so before it fell?
As for how the towers and building 7 fell go see the photos of the 45 degree angle cuts on the steel beams, go see the photos of the molten steel that lay in pools beneath the towers for weeks.
These are standard cuts you see with controlled demo. The molten steel shows that the charges set to cut the steel may have been thermite.
The fire doesn't need to continue long enough and hot enough to melt steel, it just needs to burn hot enough and long enough to heat the metal enough that its ultimate failure condition falls below its current loading condition.
The beam does not need to melt at all for this to happen. Heated steel is substantially weaker than steel under normal conditions, and the beams will fail long before they melt under their given conditions. Then you have the crash down events that deliver impulses to all the floors and beams under them well above their load limits and so they fail and it just cascades down the tower.
At no point do the beams need to melt.
Yet they did melt, what does that tell you?? Nano thermite.
Did they melt prior to the building collapse, or after it was in a pile and burning for weeks in an insulated environment where it acts as a kiln?
You can see the molten steel flowing down the remaining columns in streams, the boots of the workers melted from the heat, there was some beneath the rubble but there was also a large open pool in the photos taken at the time. The firefighters discussed it in detail in some videos. There are photos of partially molten beams as well.
Would a kiln effect have contributed to the length of time it remained molten, probably. The first question to ask is what would have driven the steel to such a consistency in the first place.