the heat from plane fuel would have had NO impact on the steel of this building
So the steel is magic and just defies the laws of physics? It doesn't matter that it's "japanese steel, extraordinary for its strength and the heat used to create it in the first place" because steel subjected to high enough heat for a long enough period of time will have a reduction in its carrying capacity and under the conditions of the WTC, will fail. You speak authoritatively on a subject that you very obviously have no fucking experience or familiarity with.
I am beginning to think you are intentionally ignorant.
Go check the burn temperature of plane fuel, then check the melting point of the specific Japanese steel used in the towers. Also the plane fuel would have been consumed immediately, not long enough of a time to effect the steel. This of course is specious as there were no planes.
Did you bother to watch the video of building 7 in free fall, did you bother to watch the video of the BBC announcing the fall of building 7 an hour or so before it fell?
As for how the towers and building 7 fell go see the photos of the 45 degree angle cuts on the steel beams, go see the photos of the molten steel that lay in pools beneath the towers for weeks.
These are standard cuts you see with controlled demo. The molten steel shows that the charges set to cut the steel may have been thermite.
Go check the burn temperature of plane fuel, then check the melting point of the specific Japanese steel used in the towers.
It does not need to melt in order for the heat to weaken the strength of the steel. Materials science 101.
Also the plane fuel would have been consumed immediately, not long enough of a time to effect the steel.
It would however be sufficiently long enough to start secondary fires, perhaps all the carpet and filing cabinets and cubicles and desks and computers and chairs and all the rest?
This of course is specious as there were no planes.
Which is literally nonsense.
Did you bother to watch the video of building 7 in free fall, did you bother to watch the video of the BBC announcing the fall of building 7 an hour or so before it fell?
How does this relate to there being planes or not, or to the simple fact that steel doesn't need to melt in order to fail?
You are now just sad, I was replying to your comment on plane fuel causing them to fall which not only is not possible but as there were no planes is moot.
I referenced Building 7 which was not hit by any "plane' so its falling at free fall should be suspicious.
You clearly need to believe a lie, I leave you to it.
So the steel is magic and just defies the laws of physics? It doesn't matter that it's "japanese steel, extraordinary for its strength and the heat used to create it in the first place" because steel subjected to high enough heat for a long enough period of time will have a reduction in its carrying capacity and under the conditions of the WTC, will fail. You speak authoritatively on a subject that you very obviously have no fucking experience or familiarity with.
I am beginning to think you are intentionally ignorant.
Go check the burn temperature of plane fuel, then check the melting point of the specific Japanese steel used in the towers. Also the plane fuel would have been consumed immediately, not long enough of a time to effect the steel. This of course is specious as there were no planes.
Did you bother to watch the video of building 7 in free fall, did you bother to watch the video of the BBC announcing the fall of building 7 an hour or so before it fell?
As for how the towers and building 7 fell go see the photos of the 45 degree angle cuts on the steel beams, go see the photos of the molten steel that lay in pools beneath the towers for weeks.
These are standard cuts you see with controlled demo. The molten steel shows that the charges set to cut the steel may have been thermite.
It does not need to melt in order for the heat to weaken the strength of the steel. Materials science 101.
It would however be sufficiently long enough to start secondary fires, perhaps all the carpet and filing cabinets and cubicles and desks and computers and chairs and all the rest?
Which is literally nonsense.
How does this relate to there being planes or not, or to the simple fact that steel doesn't need to melt in order to fail?
You are now just sad, I was replying to your comment on plane fuel causing them to fall which not only is not possible but as there were no planes is moot.
I referenced Building 7 which was not hit by any "plane' so its falling at free fall should be suspicious.
You clearly need to believe a lie, I leave you to it.