14
Comments (21)
sorted by:
2
morrowlane 2 points ago +2 / -0

What are we conserving? (honest question)

1
AlFreeman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Constitution and a government based on individual liberty. Fucking North Korea and China are nation states too. That's not the key component like the tweeter argues.

1
NerBolanski [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

George Washington and the Founding Fathers would disagree with you. You can't just build a Nation based on Values, Freedom, and Constitution. Your Nation will easily get subverted; It is a great idea in Theory but It doesn't work out as many of us think.

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

And yet China and North Korea are free from the divisive power of family (ethnic/racial) division. They're weakness is 'UGELY from the fact that their people arent free. compare north vs south korea and China vs Taiwan, broad ethnic homogeneity is a strength of any nation, horribly handicapped by totalitarian communist governments.

1
NerBolanski [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have no idea.Civnats always talk about conserving "values and culture" but how would you conserve values without conserving the ethnic groups or races associated with these values?

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

Family, is the single most deterministic factor in roughly 80% of your values, culture, language, personality, religion, and outcome. we are foolish to ignore it. America is America because of Americans, the roughly, western, Anglo-Germanic, protestant people that over generations developed the carrots and sticks to develop a culture, language, religion, philosophy, and FAMILY STRUCTURE, that would always in every place develop: RULE OF LAW, HIERARCHY, REPRESENTATIVE REPUPLICAN DEMOCRACY, RATIONALISM, FREE ENTERPRISE. The family, nothing else (practically) matters.

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity.."

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

also, fuck civnats, cf. liberia

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

the natural enemy of communism is nationalism.

0
bbqbrisket 0 points ago +1 / -1

This bitch is a just a neonazi. As a black pede she can suck my dick.

2
NerBolanski [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I respect you because you support Trump and the USA but she is far from a Neo-Nazi. She is saying the truth; conserving the nation-state doesn't mean we throw out minorities from America. Minorities can exist and we still preserve the American Nation state.

1
bbqbrisket 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then why do you think the she holds race as such an important thing?

What does race have to do with American culture?

2
NerBolanski [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

race is very important because the American Nation needs a core heritage to survive . After world war 2, all European or western nations lost their national sovereignty and fell under the power of global and subversive agencies. These hostile agencies introduced several policies and ideas to these countries which were either forced deceptive or manipulative. A lot of the Immigration policies currently in America is Forced and deceptive; It doesn't help Blacks who need better community building and integration, and it doesn't help Whites who are forced to contend with over taxation and emotional or mental breakdown in their communities. The lady in the tweet talks about race because Preserving or conserving the race or historical tribes in America(Mostly white and Black with the Natives) is an easier way to conserve the traditions of America. The civnat theory of conserving Nations just by "values" instead of "ethnic identity" doesn't work when the children of some 1st generation immigrants or Minorities vote Leftist 90 % of the time. if White Americans don't vote or reduce their population at very drastic levels, Republicans won't be able to win and we would have a hard time trying to conserve America or fight against communism. Race= Ethnic groups, tribe, ancestry. American culture historically is mostly European descended, and inputs from African Americans. It is not good to focus too much on "race" but Many white conservatives make the mistake of totally ignoring "race" and They run into problems because of this.

0
morrowlane 0 points ago +1 / -1

Race has everything to do with a "nation" - a people of common descent. A nation, lit. of common birth, has everything to do with FAMILY. . The USA is a country, again, lit. KIN-try, of a large extended family. The whole nature of "federal representation" is based on the household idea of "headship". How can my family be represented by a Somali? It cant.

2
AlFreeman 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd trust a random Somalian off the street more than any local Democrat to represent me. Better odds of that happening at least.

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

My point is, that's not representation in either case, one is not your family, the other is not your ideology. We need to reach out to our family to either convince or convict them of subverting our republic.

1
bbqbrisket 1 point ago +1 / -0

It can be respresebted by a black American, though, would you not agree?

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

welcome your thoughts on above

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, it takes generations to truly naturalize, imo. I would not feel represented by a family group 1000s of years removed from my own. (again, not less of a person by any means, but i wouldnt feel represented in a "federal headship" sense by a black person). I'd love there to be a distinction made between residents and citizens. blacks, again, no offense, are residents (former slaves, sadly) of an anglo-germanic, european, colony. Common blood is the strongest reason people who disagree are forced to work it out, they're your family.. i dont feel that sense with people enslaved and brought here against their will. my family were settlers. yours were slaves. that is going to be a distinction culturally, linguistically, and biologically for generations.

1
morrowlane 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, that was Abraham Lincoln's plan. He planned to send africans back to africa. no offense. and I dont think your any less human or any of that nonsense for being 4500 years separated from my family, but yeah.. that was, and is a practical solution for two family groups (races) that dont get along.. peaceful separation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0