I have to admit, maybe it's because I've hit re-fresh on the "new" page too many times, but I struggle to understand his explanations. This one made the most sense out of all the other things I've read from him. But even then, it seems every sentence can be interpreted at least 2-3 different (unique!) ways. I'm sure what he's saying proves fraud, but my brain just is too slow to grasp it.
My name is Mike. There are an assfuckload of Mike's in a city of 500,000 people.
Realisticly, out of a random sample of 500,000 people, if you took out the top 50 most common names, there wouldn't even be 234,914 people left. The probability of this happening decrease exponentially for every name you introduce after the first 50.
This is getting annoying. It's obviously difficult to explain without giving an example of what he is talking about. So, what is The Name With 234,914 Instances? Does he think he'd be violating privacy to reveal it? I don't get it. Why the extended tease? What's he waiting for?
first you gotta establish a benchmark of sorts. How many unique names are there in Rhode Island for example? what about a larger state like Ohio or Michigan?
Actually id bet there are at least 2 Robitussins. Thinkin there is prob a lot of folks in Atlanta that are sippin on the sizzurp so chances are better than dying from covid
I have to admit, maybe it's because I've hit re-fresh on the "new" page too many times, but I struggle to understand his explanations. This one made the most sense out of all the other things I've read from him. But even then, it seems every sentence can be interpreted at least 2-3 different (unique!) ways. I'm sure what he's saying proves fraud, but my brain just is too slow to grasp it.
Bobby Piton put all his points into Math. He is brilliant, but not good at explaining.
My name is Mike. There are an assfuckload of Mike's in a city of 500,000 people.
Realisticly, out of a random sample of 500,000 people, if you took out the top 50 most common names, there wouldn't even be 234,914 people left. The probability of this happening decrease exponentially for every name you introduce after the first 50.
To be fair, there can’t be that many Dakwanzaas, La-as, Taniquas, etc.
La'a... comma to the top.
I normal situations, yes, but I was referring to the legend (it’s GOT to be bullshit, right???) of La-a = “Ladasha”
Yours is phonetically correct lol.
Somebody hook Bobby up with an intro to Dennis Prager. Prager U can probably make a 60 second video that explains it all.
This is getting annoying. It's obviously difficult to explain without giving an example of what he is talking about. So, what is The Name With 234,914 Instances? Does he think he'd be violating privacy to reveal it? I don't get it. Why the extended tease? What's he waiting for?
If I'm understanding him correctly, it's not one name 234,914 times.
It's 234,914 names that are all different from every other name.
See, this is why he needs to provide examples.
Thanks!
first you gotta establish a benchmark of sorts. How many unique names are there in Rhode Island for example? what about a larger state like Ohio or Michigan?
I don’t understand this argument the way it’s been framed. Try again pls...I want to understand
He's been doing this for days. Instead of saying "Here's an analogy describing my evidence" why not go straight to "Here's my evidence"?
We just did a census.
Why have we not correlated the voting names to the new census records?
Thought they blocked the census info specifically for this situation?
Has Bobby posted his stuff to download anywhere? I'm a database guy and I'd love to stick this into Power BI.
Actually id bet there are at least 2 Robitussins. Thinkin there is prob a lot of folks in Atlanta that are sippin on the sizzurp so chances are better than dying from covid
LOGIC IS RAYCISS!!