Where was his stand against the states whose election processes were modified by non-legislative means, contra Article II, Section 1?
If he didn’t stand to guard the Constitution then he shouldn’t hide behind it now.
Let’s pretend he’s correct, though. Colton is implying the Electoral Count Act of 1887 is unconstitutional, THEREFORE, he needs to force a challenge by SCOTUS so that it is remedied NOW and not in another crisis however long from now.
Where was his stand against the states whose election processes were modified by non-legislative means, contra Article II, Section 1?
If he didn’t stand to guard the Constitution then he shouldn’t hide behind it now.
Let’s pretend he’s correct, though. Colton is implying the Electoral Count Act of 1887 is unconstitutional, THEREFORE, he needs to force a challenge by SCOTUS so that it is remedied NOW and not in another crisis however long from now.