https://www.scribd.com/document/474814711/Wade-Et-Al-v-Lin-Wood-Complaint#from_embed
Read page 44-45.
Read the whole thing if you like, emails start on page 31.
Now stop, leave the man alone.
https://www.scribd.com/document/474814711/Wade-Et-Al-v-Lin-Wood-Complaint#from_embed
Read page 44-45.
Read the whole thing if you like, emails start on page 31.
Now stop, leave the man alone.
No, that's Lin Wood admitting to have mental health issues and not doing proper due dilligence when making accusations. I'm pointing out a pattern of behaviour here. This is important because he has produced no evidence of his current allegations.
Im saying to you don't take him too seriously until he brings the receipts and understand that he himself has admitted that he is not well.
I don’t quite understand what ad hominem is... can you please help and explain possibly using your accusations against the OP as an example. Thanks so much.
Edit: after reading this back again I see that it potentially comes across as sarcasm. I’m serious. I don’t quite get what ad hominem is in context
No, you saying the allegations can't be trusted because of his ex co-workers donation history is ad hominem. Keeping their donation history in mind while assessing their claims however is perfectly reasonable, but they also provided evidence for their claims. That's the difference.
Lin Wood admitting to being unwell and making false accusations is pertinent and not ad hominem. It's background to remember when assessing his claims, especially since he refuses to provide any actual evidence for what he is saying.
That issue being a lack of evidence.