https://www.scribd.com/document/474814711/Wade-Et-Al-v-Lin-Wood-Complaint#from_embed
Read page 44-45.
Read the whole thing if you like, emails start on page 31.
Now stop, leave the man alone.
https://www.scribd.com/document/474814711/Wade-Et-Al-v-Lin-Wood-Complaint#from_embed
Read page 44-45.
Read the whole thing if you like, emails start on page 31.
Now stop, leave the man alone.
No, you saying the allegations can't be trusted because of his ex co-workers donation history is ad hominem. Keeping their donation history in mind while assessing their claims however is perfectly reasonable, but they also provided evidence for their claims. That's the difference.
Lin Wood admitting to being unwell and making false accusations is pertinent and not ad hominem. It's background to remember when assessing his claims, especially since he refuses to provide any actual evidence for what he is saying.
That issue being a lack of evidence.