965
Comments (30)
sorted by:
55
Siteless_Vagrant 55 points ago +56 / -1

This is great. No, really. Let all companies from this day forward start discriminating based on political donations. Big business's will tank, because they don't have any conservative employee's to carry the libtards, and small business's will be the only place they can work, which will lead to more small business's.

-5
AtomicShnoz -5 points ago +5 / -10

you are assuming they do not like conservatives. what if they will not employ you if you have donated to BLM? Remember how cool it was when all those businesses banned Gov Coumo?

26
Siteless_Vagrant 26 points ago +27 / -1

A) a conservative company wouldn't pull this shit because ACLU would jump all over 'em

 

B) a donation to "Act Blue" goes to BLM.

9
Waitafriggingminute 9 points ago +9 / -0

A donation to Act Blue goes into DNC coffers. A donation to BLM goes to Act Blue which then goes into DNC coffers...

2
AtomicShnoz 2 points ago +4 / -2

You wanna go after them (lefties) then you end up going after persons who will remain nameless too (conservatives). The ACLU and the broken justice system is a separate issue.

5
AtomicShnoz 5 points ago +12 / -7

cool downvote bro. such fags. freedom goes both ways. you wanna ban commies then you can ban conservatives too. Pro-Tip don't work for commies. Example: Excuse me before i accept this position please show me how your corporation has donated politically. Oh you are globohomos? I will pass on the offer and work cutting grass for myself.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
5
Prometheus76 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have a buddy who works 14 hours per day from April until the end of September, then spends the winter fishing. He loves it.

13
Billybobcuccio 13 points ago +13 / -0

Holy shit that violates new Hampshire state law atleast. We can’t not hire you over political beliefs. This is the way of the Nazis. The white liberals in my town won’t come in anymore to my restaurant because my family supports the president

10
slaphappy2 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sue ? NO STANDING !

7
AtomicShnoz 7 points ago +8 / -1

Sauce? Who is Lincoln? what is their political contribution policy?

a person who will remain nameless will not sell to people who vote democrat. It is my right not to sell to you or employ you. To force me to is unconstitutional and anti-American.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
12
AtomicShnoz 12 points ago +12 / -0

Correct. The courts have upheld the one sided BS. You can force a Christian to make a gay cake but a Muslim is exempt.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
ProgramNerd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Be easier to list off the reasons we don't at this point:

#1. Passive RINOs/cuckservatives are scared.

#2. Leftists would also like it if you sit quietly and do nothing.

Finished.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
AtomicShnoz 4 points ago +4 / -0

OK i found it. This is Lincoln Financial Group. I read their political contributions page (reported) and it is $1000 - $5000 per scumbag. not worth spending your time on. However remember the financial industry heavily backed Biden they rely on government regulation to make money

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
WhatYouCameToHear 1 point ago +1 / -0

This.

4
HoobyJoobury 4 points ago +4 / -0

Actually this is not what it appears. ALL financial firms are subject to certain federal controls as well as industry agency (specifically FINRA), and one of the requirements is that they track everything their employees do, even off the clock. I'm just a broker, and we're subjected to such scrutiny that I have to give my banking info to my company, and I cannot have accounts they do not approve. This also applies to political contributions, as financial services employees have restrictions on donation amounts that other people don't have, so that the firm can avoid even appearing to have a conflict of interest. I'm not a particular fan of Lincoln Financial, but this is not anything related to left vs. Right or political discrimination. They just throw the termination clause in so that if we get caught doing something unsavory in our personal lives, the firm can disavow.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
HoobyJoobury 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is really frustrating :( i know how you feel- I had to sell all my bitcoin holdings when I got this job, because my firm's platform doesn't support it and I couldn't get approved for an outside account. I still say worth it for the job, but it hurt to watch the value spike so hard from the sidelines. I wish the restrictions didn't apply to spouses- that in particular stinks, because your spouse has to be on board with the sacrifice.

3
clintonsserver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another tiny hat owned shady financial company...so shocked.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
bojackjohnson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was always taught to keep politics and religion out of business. What the hell happened? Now every business seems to pick a side by choice, or be forced to pick a side through public pressure.

1
WhatYouCameToHear 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is standard practice in financial institutions. This nothing to throw the red flag for. The purpose of this is for regulatory compliance. It’s no different than having to disclose financial positions or business interests.

This is only important because of bad actors, but in the finance sector this is BAU.

1
DudeNoOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just lie to them.

1
AmericaFloats 1 point ago +1 / -0

no, you don't SUE Communists..

1
koyima 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let them segregate business by politics, soon the people that have skills will be on one side and the people with gender studies degrees will be on the other

Guess who wins out?

0
slangin_paint 0 points ago +1 / -1

Actually this is the first amendment in action. Lincoln Financial is exercising their right to free association by declining to associate with people who have different politics. Freedom.