There is “statistical” and “physical”evidence. It’s usually brought up in court that way as well. Hopefully the statistical let’s you get the physical via warrants.
For instance, say there was an accident. It’s “likely” if there were only two cars on the area in a given time, that one or both were involved. It’s so probable that we can get a warrant or at least reasonably investigate (given resource constraints).
If instead one million cars were on the area, we’d have to narrow the search region. It’s probably most cars were not involved.
In this real case related to voter fraud, the statistical evidence is extremely odd. Making it so unlikely, that everyone should do a manual hand recount of all the ballots
You need to see my other post, and not surprisingly the truth is downvoted to shit because it is a hard truth that nobody wants to hear.
Data analysis points to anomalies, NOBODY is arguing that. However, those anomalies should be taken to the local level and get an immediate injunction/audit approval by whoever the governing body is. Newsflash, that IS NOT the court system, it is city council/aldermen/municipal supervisors/etc.
And there lies the rub..... we don't have a chance in hell going through the system by the book because there isn't a single major municipal city run by Republicans. We have become so fucking complacent and lazy at the local government level over the last 40 years that the enemy has literally taken over every single level of politics in every major city.
Stop thinking the courts are going to solve this, they aren't.
And yet if this data is presented to a court system to show that it points to anomalies, the courts should make those municipalities follow through in the investigation that data is laying the ground for.
And you expect major cities to vote for anything sensible, and not just ratchets offering gimme dats? Why not try to lasso the moon down while you're at it?
Please, people in cities vote for "free shit" and gimme dats, they don't vote for anything actually beneficial to them. The past 60 years of the destruction of these cities due to the forced welfare/dependency state and identity politics shows the people voting in cities don't know what's good for them, and adding to that that the collective iq of the inner cities is less than 75, you think they would actually be capable of the first element, let alone the second?
Hence why you bring this to the courts, because people in cities for the most are too stupid to support anything that's actually for their own good, and as we've seen with examples like Kim in baltimore, even when you try to appeal to them and try to change at that local level in cities, they're too inept to follow through.
There is “statistical” and “physical”evidence. It’s usually brought up in court that way as well. Hopefully the statistical let’s you get the physical via warrants.
For instance, say there was an accident. It’s “likely” if there were only two cars on the area in a given time, that one or both were involved. It’s so probable that we can get a warrant or at least reasonably investigate (given resource constraints).
If instead one million cars were on the area, we’d have to narrow the search region. It’s probably most cars were not involved.
In this real case related to voter fraud, the statistical evidence is extremely odd. Making it so unlikely, that everyone should do a manual hand recount of all the ballots
You need to see my other post, and not surprisingly the truth is downvoted to shit because it is a hard truth that nobody wants to hear.
Data analysis points to anomalies, NOBODY is arguing that. However, those anomalies should be taken to the local level and get an immediate injunction/audit approval by whoever the governing body is. Newsflash, that IS NOT the court system, it is city council/aldermen/municipal supervisors/etc.
And there lies the rub..... we don't have a chance in hell going through the system by the book because there isn't a single major municipal city run by Republicans. We have become so fucking complacent and lazy at the local government level over the last 40 years that the enemy has literally taken over every single level of politics in every major city.
Stop thinking the courts are going to solve this, they aren't.
Fucking THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
And yet if this data is presented to a court system to show that it points to anomalies, the courts should make those municipalities follow through in the investigation that data is laying the ground for.
And you expect major cities to vote for anything sensible, and not just ratchets offering gimme dats? Why not try to lasso the moon down while you're at it?
Cities vote for shit that people cry about on their doorstep. They don't vote for shit because someone shared a spreadsheet in an echo chamber.
Please, people in cities vote for "free shit" and gimme dats, they don't vote for anything actually beneficial to them. The past 60 years of the destruction of these cities due to the forced welfare/dependency state and identity politics shows the people voting in cities don't know what's good for them, and adding to that that the collective iq of the inner cities is less than 75, you think they would actually be capable of the first element, let alone the second?
Hence why you bring this to the courts, because people in cities for the most are too stupid to support anything that's actually for their own good, and as we've seen with examples like Kim in baltimore, even when you try to appeal to them and try to change at that local level in cities, they're too inept to follow through.