7005
Comments (361)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
XithePooh 1 point ago +1 / -0

And yet if this data is presented to a court system to show that it points to anomalies, the courts should make those municipalities follow through in the investigation that data is laying the ground for.

And you expect major cities to vote for anything sensible, and not just ratchets offering gimme dats? Why not try to lasso the moon down while you're at it?

0
glasses2020 0 points ago +1 / -1

Cities vote for shit that people cry about on their doorstep. They don't vote for shit because someone shared a spreadsheet in an echo chamber.

1
XithePooh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Please, people in cities vote for "free shit" and gimme dats, they don't vote for anything actually beneficial to them. The past 60 years of the destruction of these cities due to the forced welfare/dependency state and identity politics shows the people voting in cities don't know what's good for them, and adding to that that the collective iq of the inner cities is less than 75, you think they would actually be capable of the first element, let alone the second?

Hence why you bring this to the courts, because people in cities for the most are too stupid to support anything that's actually for their own good, and as we've seen with examples like Kim in baltimore, even when you try to appeal to them and try to change at that local level in cities, they're too inept to follow through.