Except Benford's Law is a rule that CAN apply but DOESN'T always, particularly when dealing with non-random numbers from the onset.
If you have an average of votes in precincts in, say, the 300s range then ya, 3 will be the guaranteed most common number and not 1. It doesn't need to be "fixed" for that. It is by no means enough to prove it "beyond a reasonable doubt" as OP puts it.
We have more than enough evidence with other instances, the unwillingness for them to allow proper audits and recounts without at least huge delays and court challenges is also damning.
I literally ran through the statistical data myself comparing Trump to Biden. Not only Trump, but the other 2 candidates. The only candidates that did not match was Biden and write-ins (because most write-ins had literally 1 vote, and in that case if you sum them all together, then they ALSO follow Benford's Law).
Only one candidate did not follow statistics and that was Biden.
Except Benford's Law is a rule that CAN apply but DOESN'T always, particularly when dealing with non-random numbers from the onset.
If you have an average of votes in precincts in, say, the 300s range then ya, 3 will be the guaranteed most common number and not 1. It doesn't need to be "fixed" for that. It is by no means enough to prove it "beyond a reasonable doubt" as OP puts it.
We have more than enough evidence with other instances, the unwillingness for them to allow proper audits and recounts without at least huge delays and court challenges is also damning.
Then explain to me why Trump's data follows the pattern everywhere, but Biden's doesn't m this includes Pennsylvania and Georgia
I literally ran through the statistical data myself comparing Trump to Biden. Not only Trump, but the other 2 candidates. The only candidates that did not match was Biden and write-ins (because most write-ins had literally 1 vote, and in that case if you sum them all together, then they ALSO follow Benford's Law).
Only one candidate did not follow statistics and that was Biden.
Trolling it is.
Every single court has refused to see any evidence. Everyone here knows that, except for shills that pretend not to.
Are you trolling, or just clueless?