It's been known since around the time that Benford came up with the law that it doesn't work for things like precinct numbers. They aren't random and they aren't on a large scale.
Think about how they even try to split some precincts up into near equal voting total expectations. How is Benford's Law going to apply when you guess that 50000 votes will be cast and split that into 90 precincts? 100% chance 5 will be the most common number then.
If every ballot had a unique identifying number and they went and created fake ballots... you'd actually probably still get Benford's Law to apply there since no way they would manually create the unique ID for those fake ballots but simply generate it and take their chances of a duplicate.
According to Benfords Law, Trump cheated in California, Illinois and New Mexico.
Spend an hour doing your own research. Irregularities in the election data feed, and the injection of fraudulent ballots in the adjudication process is where the fraud is. This is the only thing we should be pushing.
Data feed vote tally subtractions.
Election Interference preventing adjudicated ballots from being properly vetted.
That's our proof. Anything else should be considered a red herring designed to discredit us.
You clearly don't understand how Benfords Law is being applied here.
We are looking at distributions between different county results.
I am definitely going to accuse others of not doing their own research considering this has been OLD NEWS for over a month yet we're still pushing posts lying about how this proves fraud to the front page.
It's been known since around the time that Benford came up with the law that it doesn't work for things like precinct numbers. They aren't random and they aren't on a large scale.
Think about how they even try to split some precincts up into near equal voting total expectations. How is Benford's Law going to apply when you guess that 50000 votes will be cast and split that into 90 precincts? 100% chance 5 will be the most common number then.
If every ballot had a unique identifying number and they went and created fake ballots... you'd actually probably still get Benford's Law to apply there since no way they would manually create the unique ID for those fake ballots but simply generate it and take their chances of a duplicate.
According to Benfords Law, Trump cheated in California, Illinois and New Mexico.
Spend an hour doing your own research. Irregularities in the election data feed, and the injection of fraudulent ballots in the adjudication process is where the fraud is. This is the only thing we should be pushing.
Data feed vote tally subtractions.
Election Interference preventing adjudicated ballots from being properly vetted.
That's our proof. Anything else should be considered a red herring designed to discredit us.
You clearly don't understand how Benfords Law is being applied here.
We are looking at distributions between different county results.
I am definitely going to accuse others of not doing their own research considering this has been OLD NEWS for over a month yet we're still pushing posts lying about how this proves fraud to the front page.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2DRwt6RWyc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etx0k1nLn78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtmkYMYhGjU