7005
Comments (361)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
UpTrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Then explain to me why Trump's data follows the pattern everywhere, but Biden's doesn't m this includes Pennsylvania and Georgia

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
nenorpg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I literally ran through the statistical data myself comparing Trump to Biden. Not only Trump, but the other 2 candidates. The only candidates that did not match was Biden and write-ins (because most write-ins had literally 1 vote, and in that case if you sum them all together, then they ALSO follow Benford's Law).

Only one candidate did not follow statistics and that was Biden.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
nenorpg 1 point ago +1 / -0

What statistics is a candidate supposed to follow?

Benford's LAW. You know the one that every other candidate follows except for Biden

1
FormerGraveheart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trolling it is.

If it was such good evidence at least some of it would have made it through a trial

Every single court has refused to see any evidence. Everyone here knows that, except for shills that pretend not to.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
FormerGraveheart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe, just maybe, if a court didn’t hear a case it was for good reasons?

Maybe... but no. Not at all. Sorry, you're stupid.

0
FormerGraveheart 0 points ago +1 / -1

If it was such good evidence at least some of it would have made it through a trial

Are you trolling, or just clueless?