According to Benfords Law, Trump cheated in California, Illinois and New Mexico.
Spend an hour doing your own research. Irregularities in the election data feed, and the injection of fraudulent ballots in the adjudication process is where the fraud is. This is the only thing we should be pushing.
Data feed vote tally subtractions.
Election Interference preventing adjudicated ballots from being properly vetted.
That's our proof. Anything else should be considered a red herring designed to discredit us.
You clearly don't understand how Benfords Law is being applied here.
We are looking at distributions between different county results.
I am definitely going to accuse others of not doing their own research considering this has been OLD NEWS for over a month yet we're still pushing posts lying about how this proves fraud to the front page.
I never said "Benford’s law can’t be used on this type of data" and I clearly stated that we are looking at county level results. Trump won 22 counties in California, 88 counties in Illinois and 20 counties in New Mexico.
Not sure what you're getting at now, the injection of fraudulent votes in the adjudication process has always been the primary vector of the fraud, we just can't seem to have hard enough evidence. Benfords Law doesn't prove or disprove that, it just shows where it was most likely to have occurred.
According to Benfords Law, Trump cheated in California, Illinois and New Mexico.
Spend an hour doing your own research. Irregularities in the election data feed, and the injection of fraudulent ballots in the adjudication process is where the fraud is. This is the only thing we should be pushing.
Data feed vote tally subtractions.
Election Interference preventing adjudicated ballots from being properly vetted.
That's our proof. Anything else should be considered a red herring designed to discredit us.
You clearly don't understand how Benfords Law is being applied here.
We are looking at distributions between different county results.
I am definitely going to accuse others of not doing their own research considering this has been OLD NEWS for over a month yet we're still pushing posts lying about how this proves fraud to the front page.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u2DRwt6RWyc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etx0k1nLn78 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CtmkYMYhGjU
I never said "Benford’s law can’t be used on this type of data" and I clearly stated that we are looking at county level results. Trump won 22 counties in California, 88 counties in Illinois and 20 counties in New Mexico.
Not sure what you're getting at now, the injection of fraudulent votes in the adjudication process has always been the primary vector of the fraud, we just can't seem to have hard enough evidence. Benfords Law doesn't prove or disprove that, it just shows where it was most likely to have occurred.