4892
Comments (555)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
KARMAAACS 3 points ago +5 / -2

Honestly, it's probably not true. Look at Rudy, he had real evidence, showed bits of it (emails but no illegal material) and sent it to the FBI about Hunter's laptop. Yes, the FBI has sat on the evidence, but Rudy did the right thing and you knew he was serious about what he had. Has Lin done any of this?

You only need to ask yourself, why would anyone go to Lin Wood and give this kind of evidence that is so damning? What has Lin done to prosecute criminal cases? Isn't he just a defamation attorney? Better yet, the person who gave Lin the evidence, why didn't they go to the authorities? The guy who had Hunter's laptop gave it to the FBI and contacted them immediately. The person to go to would be Rudy if you want this type of info out there, not Lin Wood. Rudy has a direct connection to Trump and Trump can pull the needed levers to get anyone put away if this is legitimate evidence. Yes I know the FBI sat on evidence, but if you really had this kind of material it would 100% put people away, it's indefensible.

The fact of the matter is, Lin is probably just trying to drum up support for himself on Twitter. Now I always leave the possibility that Lin is telling the truth about what he has, for all I know it could be true. But logically it doesn't make sense. But who knows, weirder things have happened, but it just doesn't add up.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
1
KARMAAACS 1 point ago +2 / -1

I dunno, look I know the proper process rarely ever amounts to results, but it's the right thing to do. If he has this material, go to the authorities, even if the authorities are corrupt at least you can say you tried and people know you're likely legit about what you saw. Right now he's just putting out a bunch of stuff and for all we know it could be true or false.