5073 DC Police said NO GUNS. Said nothing about CHOPPERS. (media.patriots.win) posted 100 days ago by intellectual-darkweb 100 days ago by intellectual-darkweb +5077 / -4 498 comments share 498 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (498) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 26 ▼ – Gwoz8881 26 points 100 days ago +26 / -0 Seriously. Do they not know what “shall not be infringed” means? Clown world permalink save report block reply ▲ 17 ▼ – Sumsuch 17 points 100 days ago +17 / -0 Do they not know what “shall not be infringed” means? Oh, OH! I know this one! It means that if you can figure out how to infringe upon it then the entire document is rendered moot, right? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – FourMoarYears 4 points 100 days ago +4 / -0 Get this guy a Senate seat! permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Sumsuch 1 point 99 days ago +1 / -0 I'm not American, so it'll have to be Dem. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – DontArkancideMeBro 2 points 100 days ago +2 / -0 No! The “right to bear arms” means that the government shall not infringe on your right to wear sleeveless garments! Something something handmaidens tale wouldn’t allow wimminz and Ma’am’s to wear sleeveless shirts in the 1700s permalink save report block reply
Seriously. Do they not know what “shall not be infringed” means? Clown world
Oh, OH! I know this one!
It means that if you can figure out how to infringe upon it then the entire document is rendered moot, right?
Get this guy a Senate seat!
I'm not American, so it'll have to be Dem.
No! The “right to bear arms” means that the government shall not infringe on your right to wear sleeveless garments! Something something handmaidens tale wouldn’t allow wimminz and Ma’am’s to wear sleeveless shirts in the 1700s