45
Comments (1)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
BillsmafiaGG 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny thing is.

I don’t believe the Patrick Byrne stories of the “shredded ballots.” He is providing just enough detail to keep attention, and claiming further text/eyewitness/video evidence forthcoming.

This may mark him as a charlatan, but in the fullness of time, he could also prove to be a sincere investigator following clues that either pan out or do not pan out.

Compare that to Georgia SOS. His explanation of the irrelevant nature of any shredded material is, on its face, perfectly reasonable (it was outer envelopes blah blah, unnecessary to save by statute).

But was he on site?

Isn’t SOS making a blind claim based on a general assumption of regular shredding activity? But he didn’t see it. He’s just in some office.

Maybe Patrick Byrne finds nothing. But at least he’s got a crew reporting back on the situation. Why is there no such level of seriousness from the SOS?

SOS may not even be incorrect, but to me he appears absolutely lazy and blind to the level of motive, means, and opportunity for fraud in the Nov elections.