Remember we need to run the clock out too. Only date in the constitution is the 20th. Wednesday is just a show that can be changed any day prior to the 20th. The objective here has always been the STATE LEGISLATORS to DE-CERTIFY. All 5 except NV start 2021 sessions today through the 13th and will de-certify one by one. If they did this too quickly through special sessions over the past few weeks if gives the Dems time to use their corrupt Judges to flip it back. The closer to the 20th the better to limit their options. In the end this is going to 50 state vote in the house on the 19th. Trump will WIN!
So I had to read it a few times, and I way to stupid to be a lawyer but the line that states "place the redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures". Redress means to "make right" So to make it right, they would have to reject those ballots that weren't legal..if I remember correctly (I am a WI resident), there were 140k or 170k ballots?
I don’t see it either. I jumped up and shouted to my wife when I read the tweet. Then I read the document .. seems rather vague but strong
Strongly worded?
Remember we need to run the clock out too. Only date in the constitution is the 20th. Wednesday is just a show that can be changed any day prior to the 20th. The objective here has always been the STATE LEGISLATORS to DE-CERTIFY. All 5 except NV start 2021 sessions today through the 13th and will de-certify one by one. If they did this too quickly through special sessions over the past few weeks if gives the Dems time to use their corrupt Judges to flip it back. The closer to the 20th the better to limit their options. In the end this is going to 50 state vote in the house on the 19th. Trump will WIN!
Not unless the ECA gets delayed as rumored
In order to correct or “redress” they have to decertify the results. That’s how I’m reading it.
It just say that people should follow the law
I would say its a nothing burger unless someone calls for the enforcement of the law and nullifies EC votes
It's not in there.
So I had to read it a few times, and I way to stupid to be a lawyer but the line that states "place the redress to these and other election law violations and failed administrative procedures". Redress means to "make right" So to make it right, they would have to reject those ballots that weren't legal..if I remember correctly (I am a WI resident), there were 140k or 170k ballots?
Ok, that does make sense!
It's literally a trap