He still has too much faith in the state. (his oxymoronic left libertarianism)
Evidence isn't proof and I doubt he's looked very much into it. He's keeping his channel up.
Of course lefties would leave his channel. That's a consequence of getting red pilled. THATS THE DAMN GOAL.
I don't know if he realizes there's no middle anymore.
He's said he's a theist.
He's stated he's pro-life.
That's what video/media personalities do (now do bannon, tucker, hannity, ingram, doore, crowder, rubin, shapiro, etc.) All these shows are the same format with different takes. It's one you don't like so you have to REEE.
It's probably too much content and a more focused look on stories would be cool but that's not what his channel is even though that's what you want it to be.
Pro-Life personally vs Pro-Life Government control
Does the government have the right to ban this outright no exceptions?
and are there times where it would be a considered action?
The solution doesn't lie within the law of this topic. It lies with prevention. You can't abort a baby if one was never made in the first place. The only reason the government aggravates this issue is the money factor.
The libertarian stance is commonly: I can be pro-life but the government cant legislate on this.
It depends on where and how you define life. My stance is when the helix winding begins, that's not just a clump of tissue but a wholy unique individual definition and prime cause. In not too many words, it's life in its earliest stages.
Libertarians debate on this as liberty should not encroach on others' rights to life. Whereupon creating a third entity, you shall not infringe upon their life with your liberty. Where it gets tricky is cases of maternal health...
The government doesn't have any business supporting infanticide or ending the life of innocents. This is a farce created by eugenicists like Sanger who wanted to abolish 'poor undesirable' breeders. The attitude prevails today.
To be fair to him, if he put out a 15 minute summary of his prior day's coverage, it'd be something I'd skim. The "in-depth" coverage got to be damn near 4chan levels of schizoposting.
Yes, Davos is ready to turn us all into milkable consoomers. Yes, globalists shills are horrid. I really didn't need to be told about that every freaking story. The backgrounding on his analysis was repetitive, brief, and shallow.
I think 15 minutes would be about the time that I'd want to hear from him on a daily basis.
Covid was a lot of ppl wake up call.
He still has too much faith in the state. (his oxymoronic left libertarianism)
Evidence isn't proof and I doubt he's looked very much into it. He's keeping his channel up.
Of course lefties would leave his channel. That's a consequence of getting red pilled. THATS THE DAMN GOAL.
I don't know if he realizes there's no middle anymore.
He's said he's a theist. He's stated he's pro-life. That's what video/media personalities do (now do bannon, tucker, hannity, ingram, doore, crowder, rubin, shapiro, etc.) All these shows are the same format with different takes. It's one you don't like so you have to REEE.
It's probably too much content and a more focused look on stories would be cool but that's not what his channel is even though that's what you want it to be.
Fair points. Also, when I last heard from him, he was a pro-choicer. Must have changed that in the past few months as well.
this is one of those topics the parties massacre.
Pro-Life personally vs Pro-Life Government control
Does the government have the right to ban this outright no exceptions? and are there times where it would be a considered action?
The solution doesn't lie within the law of this topic. It lies with prevention. You can't abort a baby if one was never made in the first place. The only reason the government aggravates this issue is the money factor.
The libertarian stance is commonly: I can be pro-life but the government cant legislate on this.
I don't agree with the premise. It's not a "timeline" thing. It's a value thing. Where does value of life come from?
It's either a theism vs non-theism premise.
Planned Parenthood gets tons of gov. kickbacks.
To be fair to him, if he put out a 15 minute summary of his prior day's coverage, it'd be something I'd skim. The "in-depth" coverage got to be damn near 4chan levels of schizoposting.
Yes, Davos is ready to turn us all into milkable consoomers. Yes, globalists shills are horrid. I really didn't need to be told about that every freaking story. The backgrounding on his analysis was repetitive, brief, and shallow.
I think 15 minutes would be about the time that I'd want to hear from him on a daily basis.
no ones making u watch
Nobody's making you shill his vids either. Just saying. ;)
you came to my post