Actually, I don't even think they're big. I think she makes them look big. Have you ever actually seen cleavage? I haven't, but I have seen outfits where they look quite small.
Extremely easy to get around, and also (added bonus), make 2 big points instead of just #1 below...hoping at least a few members of congress employ this elementary tactic:
Point #1 is "I can get around this":
Members of congress can create/share/promote memes on their social media and simply state in the body of each post that the purpose of their sharing is to "help" Pelosi by giving clear examples of what is not allowed, and tack on to every post "If my help for Pelosi by sharing this meme causes it to spread further, please know it is an unintended consequence!" ...and add a ";)" or "😉" to rub it in.
Point #2 is "Either take me at my post's word, or...":
...be forced to initiate some excruciatingly frivolous & DOA congressional debate about how to judge the intended meaning and intended audience when someone types ";)" or "😉" (and other non-text symbols).
In the end, they'll have to somehow argue that this isn't a clear violation of 1A. When the fails, they'll realize there's no way to stamp it out, AND, simply by arguing it in the first place they'll have been forced to show their true motives/colors.
Make memes, fuck Pelosi.
Right in her big, saggy, old tits!
Hey I'm about to eat breakfast here
As respectfully as I can say, I think they're exaggerated.
yeah, those are absolutely the work of some fella in LA.
Actually, I don't even think they're big. I think she makes them look big. Have you ever actually seen cleavage? I haven't, but I have seen outfits where they look quite small.
Extremely easy to get around, and also (added bonus), make 2 big points instead of just #1 below...hoping at least a few members of congress employ this elementary tactic:
Point #1 is "I can get around this": Members of congress can create/share/promote memes on their social media and simply state in the body of each post that the purpose of their sharing is to "help" Pelosi by giving clear examples of what is not allowed, and tack on to every post "If my help for Pelosi by sharing this meme causes it to spread further, please know it is an unintended consequence!" ...and add a ";)" or "😉" to rub it in.
Point #2 is "Either take me at my post's word, or...": ...be forced to initiate some excruciatingly frivolous & DOA congressional debate about how to judge the intended meaning and intended audience when someone types ";)" or "😉" (and other non-text symbols).
In the end, they'll have to somehow argue that this isn't a clear violation of 1A. When the fails, they'll realize there's no way to stamp it out, AND, simply by arguing it in the first place they'll have been forced to show their true motives/colors.