Real talk. Wouldn't abolishing section 230 make website like twitter be responsible for the content of their users? Hence the censorship would be even greater than currently. More it will open the flood gates of everybody suing owners of other websites for content users post to i
it, including possibly the .win forums? What stops a good lawyer suing .win owners for something I posted?
The issue now is they're deciding who they allow to get paid. They're already censoring what they don't like. Can't have it both ways....well, evidently they can. It's these particular sites having it both ways. You might be right that we need a scalpel instead of a hatchet to rectify.
I'd gladly sacrifice my stimulus check for repeal of section 230.
Real talk. Wouldn't abolishing section 230 make website like twitter be responsible for the content of their users? Hence the censorship would be even greater than currently. More it will open the flood gates of everybody suing owners of other websites for content users post to i it, including possibly the .win forums? What stops a good lawyer suing .win owners for something I posted?
The issue now is they're deciding who they allow to get paid. They're already censoring what they don't like. Can't have it both ways....well, evidently they can. It's these particular sites having it both ways. You might be right that we need a scalpel instead of a hatchet to rectify.
It would, but it would also allow us to sue MSM sites for libel.