2547
posted ago by gadsdendude76 ago by gadsdendude76 +2547 / -0

weird set of priorities. these bastards should have been a bit more concerned about the terror hawley's family went through last night. but, no, they had to fuck with a proud boys leader on trumped up charges. if trump fails, there will be civil war.

Comments (48)
sorted by:
40
BBQ_Beer_Freedom 40 points ago +41 / -1

They fuck with you because they don't fear you!

22
mty_green_go 22 points ago +22 / -0

The dc police are gestapo

11
iPissExcellence 11 points ago +11 / -0

They all are.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
wholesomekangz100 4 points ago +4 / -0

The dude took responsibility for the “crime” (someone else did it) because he respected the police. These moralfags are going to smile and debate while being put into the gas chambers.

2
DeboOonked 2 points ago +2 / -0

I burned that damn flag. Arrest me!

3
Marius 3 points ago +3 / -0

This kind of crap will lead to targeted assassinations, bombings, and death squads.

2
RabidZoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not yet anyway...

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
16
iPissExcellence 16 points ago +16 / -0

Hence banning our ammunition...memes.

9
gadsdendude76 [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

it's a cold civil war that could turn hot pending trump's and today's situation

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
dr_gonzo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really wish people would quit saying this. A "digital civil war" is not actually a war. A real war is when you kill people and break stuff as a means of imposing your will upon others by force. It's not memes and online bickering.

It sounds pathetic to draw parallels between trolling and actual armed conflict, and frankly, a "digital war" simply isn't going to cut it. This is going to require each of us to put our lives and fortunes on the line

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
16
PurestEvil 16 points ago +16 / -0

No. That's a word to distract from what it truly is. It's not anarchy.

It's the same old shit: Marxism, Socialism, Communism.

The selective application of rules is a basic trait of tyrannies. Rules for thee, but not for me. Even in the Soviet Union and China the roaming Bolshevik pillagers were allowed to steal, rape, murder, beat up whoever they wanted, which were primarily peasants. The powers that be allowed it to happen.

It was not Anarchy. The government has picked its side. Just as it did now.

4
Casualize 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not gonna lie, I read that as "basic trait of trannies" at first.

3
censorthisss 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anarchy has different meanings in different contexts.

What OP describes is absolutely anarcho-tyranny, which means selectively enforcing the law. It's not a distraction to point that out.

0
PurestEvil 0 points ago +1 / -1

It is absolutely not anarchy-tyranny because that is as contradictory as anarcho-communism. If it's an anarchy, then where does the tyranny come from? If it's a tyranny, then how can there be anarchy?

The government is clearly existent. It is active in persecuting people defending themselves. It is siding with a certain group of violent brown shirts. If anything, it is financing them via various means, via welfare or government employment - directly or indirectly.

There are 1000 things SHOUTING COMMUNISM yet you guys somehow come to the conclusion that the selective application of rules turns it all into something else than communism, and is therefore rebranded anarcho-tyranny. But the selective application of rules is literally part of tyranny AND communism. And NOT part of anarchy (as there would be no government to apply rules selectively).

My issue is that 1. it has nothing to do with anarchy, 2. it's an attempt to avoid calling the beast by its proper name, 3. and you hand the left so many euphemisms (including "liberal") and covers for the various things they do, which ultimately are all the same in essence. It does not help you. It confuses your own people. Thus it helps THEM.

AND NOBODY IS HISSING THE BANNER OF ANARCHO-TYRANNY BECAUSE THAT IS NOT A THING ANYONE SUBSCRIBES TO.

15
Tejanopede 15 points ago +16 / -1

See: Selective enforcement

See: Anarcho-tyranny

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
Prometheus76 6 points ago +6 / -0

The cops ARE ANTIFA. WAKE UP

7
AprilShowers 7 points ago +7 / -0

Weirdest thing to me about the arrest is that he was in a cab when it happened. I'll try to find the tweet but the reporter was interviewing him on a phone call when police flashed their lights and Tarrios told the cab driver to pull over it's for him.

How did the police know he was in that cab? Why was it that important that they arrest him over a destruction of property misdemeanor? About a billion other questions you can tack on to that as well.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
6
Rtsands45 6 points ago +6 / -0

In DC the police are outnumbered. Just encircle the police detain and disarm them. Put them under citizen's arrest for denial of "we the people's" basic human rights.

4
Rtsands45 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh and I forgot if they fight back you must yell stop resisting at them.

4
J_Von_Random 4 points ago +4 / -0

POLICE STATE IS PRETTY MUCH HERE

Decades old news.

4
TrannyHorse 4 points ago +4 / -0

We are in deep stages of demoralization and disorientation. Next is crisis. How do we reverse this?

3
meme_oil 3 points ago +3 / -0

the fucking police state has been here since daryl gates set up the first swat team in LA!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Prometheus76 2 points ago +2 / -0

And the next day, they're back on the street.

2
Yahyeetw 2 points ago +2 / -0

And terrorize a senators house

2
jbDonuts 2 points ago +2 / -0

The DC mayor interfering with citizens entering the Federal Enclave of DC to exercise their 1st and 2nd amendment rights is TREASON!!!

There should be no need for a DC mayor. No civilians should be allowed to call this reservation "home". This is why.

2
Raguel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much. Most Trump supporters have always backed the blue, so when they arrest you there's generally no issue. They arrest Antifa or BLM, well they get hit with bottles, cans, mortars, fire bombs, called racist, doxed, and just about everything else under the sun.

One of these things is not like the other. But what the police unfortunately are doing by unevenly applying the law and enforcing unconstitutional edict is burning the last bridge of support they had left.

1
defiant_liberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck them. They can arrest one or two people, but they are not going to be able to arrest one or two million.

1
Hedonismbot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lawfare

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
rufrignkidnme 1 point ago +1 / -0

The mayor of DC is to blame. Maybe it's time to move the capital district.

1
ProudCHUMP4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s not fall for demoralizing tactics. Positive. Energy!

1
censorthisss 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anarcho-tyranny

Selective enforcement of the law.

1
Cold_War_Baby 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any conservative lawyer groups standing by to monitor these events? We need a right version of the ACLU standing by with bail funds and cameras ready to stand against violations of our civil liberties.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
mre_nachocheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe whilst everyone is there they should depose the mayor. Just sayin' after all D.C. is like a foreign country...............owned mostly by the Chinese.

0
Anaconda 0 points ago +5 / -5

"Muh based military" retards can go fuck themselves

2
meme_oil 2 points ago +2 / -0

fucking rerards!

0
obamagavemeaphone 0 points ago +1 / -1

Translation = must loot