129 Kamala Harris has STILL NOT RESIGNED her Senate seat which is historically unprecedented. I think the Democrats 100% know that Joe Biden will not be President. posted 49 days ago by Trump_MAGA_99 +129 / -0 19 comments share 19 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (19) sorted by: top new old worst ▲ 18 ▼ – mrbear10mm 18 points 49 days ago +18 / -0 Historically unprecedented? Are you one of those leftists that makes up your history as you go, or are you just stupid? permalink save report block reply ▲ 12 ▼ – Cheezeit7 12 points 49 days ago +12 / -0 They usually don't resign until mid january permalink save report block reply ▲ 9 ▼ – FinlandForTrump 9 points 49 days ago +9 / -0 Xiden resigned his Senate seat on Jan 15th permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -1 ▼ – deleted -1 points 49 days ago +1 / -2 ▲ 8 ▼ – deplorabetty 8 points 49 days ago +8 / -0 Hey!!! Look at me guuuuys!!! I'm repeating the same BS claim that has been debunked a million times already!! Give me upvotes!!! permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Trump_MAGA_99 [S] 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 You don’t think it looks a little weird? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deplorabetty 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 Do I think that a known liar and traitor that has a seat on the Senate Intelligence committee who hasn't resigned her seat yet looks a little weird? No. No I fucking don't. And neither does anyone else with half a brain that knows history. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – deleted 7 points 49 days ago +7 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – WishdoctorsSong 2 points 49 days ago +3 / -1 It's not unprecedented, but its certainly not a bold showing of confidence in Biden either. permalink save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 49 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – Trump_MAGA_99 [S] 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 You don’t think it’s a tiny bit suspicious? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – RollWave 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 historically unprecedented deport this fake news permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – JBlaze056 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 The phrase “historically unprecedented” means something different than how you are using it OP. permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Loscann 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 Even if she did gavin nuisance will appoint another temp radical and then put her back in permalink save report block reply ▲ 0 ▼ – Nimble_navigator92 0 points 49 days ago +2 / -2 Not only did she not resign, she was just re-sworn in for another term. IDK how it usually works but it does strike me as odd permalink save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – RollWave 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 she was just re-sworn in for another term. no she wasn't, wtf are you talking about. "another term" ... she's only 4 years into a 6 year term. only newly elected senators get "sworn in". she was "sworn in" 4 years ago. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – Nimble_navigator92 1 point 49 days ago +1 / -0 My bad I must have read some bad info. Lots of it going around right now to make us look bad permalink parent save report block reply
Historically unprecedented? Are you one of those leftists that makes up your history as you go, or are you just stupid?
They usually don't resign until mid january
Xiden resigned his Senate seat on Jan 15th
Hey!!! Look at me guuuuys!!! I'm repeating the same BS claim that has been debunked a million times already!!
Give me upvotes!!!
You don’t think it looks a little weird?
Do I think that a known liar and traitor that has a seat on the Senate Intelligence committee who hasn't resigned her seat yet looks a little weird?
No. No I fucking don't. And neither does anyone else with half a brain that knows history.
It's not unprecedented, but its certainly not a bold showing of confidence in Biden either.
You don’t think it’s a tiny bit suspicious?
deport this fake news
The phrase “historically unprecedented” means something different than how you are using it OP.
Even if she did gavin nuisance will appoint another temp radical and then put her back in
Not only did she not resign, she was just re-sworn in for another term. IDK how it usually works but it does strike me as odd
no she wasn't, wtf are you talking about.
"another term" ... she's only 4 years into a 6 year term.
only newly elected senators get "sworn in". she was "sworn in" 4 years ago.
My bad I must have read some bad info. Lots of it going around right now to make us look bad