1047
Comments (13)
sorted by:
11
USAFirst1 11 points ago +11 / -0

Everything is twisted.

They can't just report the news because that's not exciting enough so everything has a little twist now.

I read everything.

3
Gipgm2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Most chucked people only read the head lines and maybe the first paragraph

8
NeverNotTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

How do you go from "we don't expect him to be there" to "every indication we have is that the vice president will be there"?

1
meteorknife 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a reporter asks what Grassley's role on Wednesday is and he doesn't restate the question in his response.

5
killerbunny88 5 points ago +5 / -0

Um......... I read this as a veiled threat to Pence. Am I the only one?

2
JohnnyMagnum357 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fact that this was ever brought up in the first place, regardless of the 'clarification' is problematic.

It all stinks

2
ikuyas 2 points ago +2 / -0

What if Grassley's office is lying. We cannot rely on "news", and we just need the fact. We are at war where journalism is all propaganda.

2
kudupoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh, it's true. Grassley is telling you he plans to take over if Pence falters.

2
King_Boobus_Toobus 2 points ago +3 / -1

Grassley has Joe Biden level dementia.

FYI - He's next in line for POTUS after Pelosi.

1
MickHigan2 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why you do not listen to the MSM or any blue narrative. All propagandists.

1
JustInTime2_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Grassley needs retire. Maybe a good person but he has been in Congress too long. This goes for all politicians who have been in office since the late 1980s and 1990s.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0