9302
Comments (1040)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
bingobangobongo69 1 point ago +2 / -1

As I said:

over the objections of Congress.

In both those cases, Congress didn't give a fuck because it was obvious who the votes were for so there were no objections.

In 1876, when there actually was a massive controversy about the electoral votes, the VP didn't do anything.

4
LiberatedDeathStar 4 points ago +4 / -0

1876 was an illegal and off the books decision though. They didn't follow any constitutional procedure, this is all Calvinball now.

1
bingobangobongo69 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's my point.

1
LiberatedDeathStar 1 point ago +1 / -0

There have been times the VP did do something, however. So it could go however it goes.