2 hours later, they are going to announce that they will not bring charges against the officers who shot Jacob Blake. The city will riot tonight, weather is kinda nice
This attorney didn't even file an 8th amendment appeal to lower his excessive bail, but somehow saw fit to charge himself $300K in fees before his client was even out of jail, paid for from the funds we raised for Kyle's bail. Lin Wood also redirected a few hundred thousand into his FightBack foundation out of which I am sure he's paying himself a handsome salary.
I still have reservations about calling him a hero. People keep doing that and I don't think they consider what it means for him or that it puts a target on his back.
He didn't do anything wrong, but I think calling him a hero is a bit much. He's just a kid that asked people not to set other people's stuff on fire or vandalize it and defended himself when he was attacked. That should be a pretty normal thing to do.
He also DIDN'T harm anyone else, in a situation where even the most seasoned veteran would have been hard pressed to keep calm and have steady aim. His ability to recognize real threats and ignore mere posturing was heroic and would be lauded as such by anyone willing to see reality.
As far as his consequences go, Kyle is being charged with intentional, reckless, and attempted homicide. Two counts of recklessly endangering safety for firing shots. Those are the five felonies.
Minor in possession of firearm. That's the misdemeanor.
Curfew violation. Civil citation. Let's put this one to bed first. How about every other person out there? Unequal application of law. But OK it's a citation.
I've heard that there is some sort of loophole on the minor in possession of a firearm in Wisconsin, but I don't even care to comment on it. Feel free to.
Now for the five felonies. If I had this mob (I'll use that word but sure, it's inflammatory) chasing after me, I would absolutely be fearing for my life. Many videos have come out these past years showing these "protestors" killing people, or at the least beating the daylights out of them. Some may argue, "Well, he should not have been there." Point stipulated, but that does not overcome the simple argument that follows. He was being chased. Groups of this nature have shown that they are out for blood. I do not even need to take the argument this far to dispel these charges, but I could easily argue that his only recourse in this instance was the use of lethal force. The guy tried to grab his firearm. Kyle was not the aggressor.
These groups gang up on people and beat the crap out of them, or kill them like the former police officer protecting that pawn shop. When the gang reaches you, you have no shot except using lethal force like a firearm. They were after him. For self preservation, he may have had no choice. And I have not confirmed, but I've seen that there was a gunshot very close by JUST prior to Kyle firing at his first pursuer. I respect the dead but use that word factually.
Kyle RETURNS to the person he shot because he is not out there out for blood. The kid was scared and I presume he called 911 right there. Being scared, he begins to flee. WHILE FLEEING, people try to attack him. Remember again, he was FLEEING prior to first firing. So, again, WHILE FLEEING, he is being attacked. There are MANY people around him. When a gang gets on top of you, you have NO chance. So he turns around and fires. One of the persons he hits also has a gun. How about that? SELF DEFENSE
No duty to retreat in Wisconsin. And he TRIED. Kyle was trying to avoid death or great bodily harm. That's the definition of self-defense in Wisconsin. If it is proven that he was illegally carrying a firearm, that does not forfeit his right to self defense.
For the reckless endangerment, he only fired at people who were attacking him. Kid had NO CHOICE but to protect himself.
Looking at the facts, this looks to be an open and shut case. I opine that he should not have been there. I also opine that most of those "protestors" are law breakers. Rioting and looting is breaking the law, for one. But even more basically, it's illegal to block the road without a permit. And they were all breaking the law by breaking curfew.
I think there’s a pretty even split among us on whether or not vigilantism is acceptable or not. Just in case you aren’t aware, Paul Kersey was the character in Death Wish. If it were fact and not fiction, I’d be in the Kersey fan club btw.
The danger with vigilantism is that an innocent person is incorrectly perceived to be a criminal by the vigilante, and also that the vigilante's punishments are disproportionate. That's why we as a society have agreed that trial in front of a jury is the most reasonable option. That said, it becomes easier to sympathize with the romantic idea of vigilantism when corrupt media influences the jury pool, and corrupt courts either don't punish criminals, or let them off easy.
As far as his consequences go, Kyle is being charged with intentional, reckless, and attempted homicide. Two counts of recklessly endangering safety for firing shots. Those are the five felonies.
Minor in possession of firearm. That's the misdemeanor.
Curfew violation. Civil citation. Let's put this one to bed first. How about every other person out there? Unequal application of law. But OK it's a citation.
I've heard that there is some sort of loophole on the minor in possession of a firearm in Wisconsin, but I don't even care to comment on it. Feel free to.
Now for the five felonies. If I had this mob (I'll use that word but sure, it's inflammatory) chasing after me, I would absolutely be fearing for my life. Many videos have come out these past years showing these "protestors" killing people, or at the least beating the daylights out of them. Some may argue, "Well, he should not have been there." Point stipulated, but that does not overcome the simple argument that follows. He was being chased. Groups of this nature have shown that they are out for blood. I do not even need to take the argument this far to dispel these charges, but I could easily argue that his only recourse in this instance was the use of lethal force. The guy tried to grab his firearm. Kyle was not the aggressor.
These groups gang up on people and beat the crap out of them, or kill them like the former police officer protecting that pawn shop. When the gang reaches you, you have no shot except using lethal force like a firearm. They were after him. For self preservation, he may have had no choice. And I have not confirmed, but I've seen that there was a gunshot very close by JUST prior to Kyle firing at his first pursuer. I respect the dead but use that word factually.
Kyle RETURNS to the person he shot because he is not out there out for blood. The kid was scared and I presume he called 911 right there. Being scared, he begins to flee. WHILE FLEEING, people try to attack him. Remember again, he was FLEEING prior to first firing. So, again, WHILE FLEEING, he is being attacked. There are MANY people around him. When a gang gets on top of you, you have NO chance. So he turns around and fires. One of the persons he hits also has a gun. How about that? SELF DEFENSE
No duty to retreat in Wisconsin. And he TRIED. Kyle was trying to avoid death or great bodily harm. That's the definition of self-defense in Wisconsin. If it is proven that he was illegally carrying a firearm, that does not forfeit his right to self defense.
For the reckless endangerment, he only fired at people who were attacking him. Kid had NO CHOICE but to protect himself.
Looking at the facts, this looks to be an open and shut case. I opine that he should not have been there. I also opine that most of those "protestors" are law breakers. Rioting and looting is breaking the law, for one. But even more basically, it's illegal to block the road without a permit. And they were all breaking the law by breaking curfew.
If Biden is inaugurated Kyle will spend his life behind bars or worse.
A jury would have to convict him still. He has good lawyers and an ironclad self-defense argument.
A jury convicted Flynn.
I think we all have seen how feckless the courts can be when the left mob is threatening them.
I think you would see a full blown uprising if he were convicted. The entire local justice system would be eradicated.
2 hours later, they are going to announce that they will not bring charges against the officers who shot Jacob Blake. The city will riot tonight, weather is kinda nice
And it will be used as cover to destroy more evidence.
Ahmad Aubry is back in the news as well.
Rhymes with Lynn Would.
Also Lin Wood is a defamation attorney so him defending a murder trial would be kind of odd anyway.
I thought Lin Wood wasnt a defense attorney? Why would he affect the defense team?
This attorney didn't even file an 8th amendment appeal to lower his excessive bail, but somehow saw fit to charge himself $300K in fees before his client was even out of jail, paid for from the funds we raised for Kyle's bail. Lin Wood also redirected a few hundred thousand into his FightBack foundation out of which I am sure he's paying himself a handsome salary.
It ain't saying it was a fraud... But...
I still have reservations about calling him a hero. People keep doing that and I don't think they consider what it means for him or that it puts a target on his back.
He didn't do anything wrong, but I think calling him a hero is a bit much. He's just a kid that asked people not to set other people's stuff on fire or vandalize it and defended himself when he was attacked. That should be a pretty normal thing to do.
Kyle is a hero.
Definition of "Hero": a person who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.
Kyle killed a serial pedophile, a violent felon and domestic abuser, and permanently wounded an antifag.
And put out a dumpster fire.
He already said he killed a pedophile...oh..wait, I gotcha NVM.
He also DIDN'T harm anyone else, in a situation where even the most seasoned veteran would have been hard pressed to keep calm and have steady aim. His ability to recognize real threats and ignore mere posturing was heroic and would be lauded as such by anyone willing to see reality.
Interesting timing. The prosecutor for the Jacob Blake case is also going to announce his decision. This seems coordinated.
It's the same DA, so yeah pretty well coordinated. They've already got barricades and national guard at the ready.
FREE KYLE!
FREE KYLE and The Kenosha Policemen that shot woman beater.
As far as his consequences go, Kyle is being charged with intentional, reckless, and attempted homicide. Two counts of recklessly endangering safety for firing shots. Those are the five felonies.
Minor in possession of firearm. That's the misdemeanor.
Curfew violation. Civil citation. Let's put this one to bed first. How about every other person out there? Unequal application of law. But OK it's a citation.
I've heard that there is some sort of loophole on the minor in possession of a firearm in Wisconsin, but I don't even care to comment on it. Feel free to.
Now for the five felonies. If I had this mob (I'll use that word but sure, it's inflammatory) chasing after me, I would absolutely be fearing for my life. Many videos have come out these past years showing these "protestors" killing people, or at the least beating the daylights out of them. Some may argue, "Well, he should not have been there." Point stipulated, but that does not overcome the simple argument that follows. He was being chased. Groups of this nature have shown that they are out for blood. I do not even need to take the argument this far to dispel these charges, but I could easily argue that his only recourse in this instance was the use of lethal force. The guy tried to grab his firearm. Kyle was not the aggressor.
These groups gang up on people and beat the crap out of them, or kill them like the former police officer protecting that pawn shop. When the gang reaches you, you have no shot except using lethal force like a firearm. They were after him. For self preservation, he may have had no choice. And I have not confirmed, but I've seen that there was a gunshot very close by JUST prior to Kyle firing at his first pursuer. I respect the dead but use that word factually.
Kyle RETURNS to the person he shot because he is not out there out for blood. The kid was scared and I presume he called 911 right there. Being scared, he begins to flee. WHILE FLEEING, people try to attack him. Remember again, he was FLEEING prior to first firing. So, again, WHILE FLEEING, he is being attacked. There are MANY people around him. When a gang gets on top of you, you have NO chance. So he turns around and fires. One of the persons he hits also has a gun. How about that? SELF DEFENSE
No duty to retreat in Wisconsin. And he TRIED. Kyle was trying to avoid death or great bodily harm. That's the definition of self-defense in Wisconsin. If it is proven that he was illegally carrying a firearm, that does not forfeit his right to self defense.
For the reckless endangerment, he only fired at people who were attacking him. Kid had NO CHOICE but to protect himself.
Looking at the facts, this looks to be an open and shut case. I opine that he should not have been there. I also opine that most of those "protestors" are law breakers. Rioting and looting is breaking the law, for one. But even more basically, it's illegal to block the road without a permit. And they were all breaking the law by breaking curfew.
Thank you! I want to keep up with Kyle's situation.
They literally cut the feed as soon as the lawyer asked when and where the Rittenhouse arraignment would be.
Someone downvoted Kyle... +1717/-1... Fucking shill cucks
Free Kyle.
Sending a message to the big guy upstairs now! 🙏
He's got them.
And another Soviet Style 'trial' is begun
American badass Hero*
Best way to support Kyle is to start hanging corrupt politicians and election officials
Young Kyle is a modern day, Paul Kersey. I ride with him.
No, that’s what the left wants you to think. Paul Kersey went hunting. Kyle shot in self defense.
The real problem isn't believing that. It's believing that's even a bad thing.
I think there’s a pretty even split among us on whether or not vigilantism is acceptable or not. Just in case you aren’t aware, Paul Kersey was the character in Death Wish. If it were fact and not fiction, I’d be in the Kersey fan club btw.
The danger with vigilantism is that an innocent person is incorrectly perceived to be a criminal by the vigilante, and also that the vigilante's punishments are disproportionate. That's why we as a society have agreed that trial in front of a jury is the most reasonable option. That said, it becomes easier to sympathize with the romantic idea of vigilantism when corrupt media influences the jury pool, and corrupt courts either don't punish criminals, or let them off easy.
When there is no justice, reasonable people start doing unreasonable things.
As far as his consequences go, Kyle is being charged with intentional, reckless, and attempted homicide. Two counts of recklessly endangering safety for firing shots. Those are the five felonies.
Minor in possession of firearm. That's the misdemeanor.
Curfew violation. Civil citation. Let's put this one to bed first. How about every other person out there? Unequal application of law. But OK it's a citation.
I've heard that there is some sort of loophole on the minor in possession of a firearm in Wisconsin, but I don't even care to comment on it. Feel free to.
Now for the five felonies. If I had this mob (I'll use that word but sure, it's inflammatory) chasing after me, I would absolutely be fearing for my life. Many videos have come out these past years showing these "protestors" killing people, or at the least beating the daylights out of them. Some may argue, "Well, he should not have been there." Point stipulated, but that does not overcome the simple argument that follows. He was being chased. Groups of this nature have shown that they are out for blood. I do not even need to take the argument this far to dispel these charges, but I could easily argue that his only recourse in this instance was the use of lethal force. The guy tried to grab his firearm. Kyle was not the aggressor.
These groups gang up on people and beat the crap out of them, or kill them like the former police officer protecting that pawn shop. When the gang reaches you, you have no shot except using lethal force like a firearm. They were after him. For self preservation, he may have had no choice. And I have not confirmed, but I've seen that there was a gunshot very close by JUST prior to Kyle firing at his first pursuer. I respect the dead but use that word factually.
Kyle RETURNS to the person he shot because he is not out there out for blood. The kid was scared and I presume he called 911 right there. Being scared, he begins to flee. WHILE FLEEING, people try to attack him. Remember again, he was FLEEING prior to first firing. So, again, WHILE FLEEING, he is being attacked. There are MANY people around him. When a gang gets on top of you, you have NO chance. So he turns around and fires. One of the persons he hits also has a gun. How about that? SELF DEFENSE
No duty to retreat in Wisconsin. And he TRIED. Kyle was trying to avoid death or great bodily harm. That's the definition of self-defense in Wisconsin. If it is proven that he was illegally carrying a firearm, that does not forfeit his right to self defense.
For the reckless endangerment, he only fired at people who were attacking him. Kid had NO CHOICE but to protect himself.
Looking at the facts, this looks to be an open and shut case. I opine that he should not have been there. I also opine that most of those "protestors" are law breakers. Rioting and looting is breaking the law, for one. But even more basically, it's illegal to block the road without a permit. And they were all breaking the law by breaking curfew.
More like Bernie Goetz.