There's no law or rules stopping a judge from doing it.
A judge in his/her court is basically an emperor. If there's no rules forbidding it, they're free to do as they wish, and the local authorities have to uphold it. If the DC judge says he's banished, then he can be arrested on sight before the deadline of the order.
It's not unconstitutional. The only jurisdiction in DC is their district laws, and they have no law against it. Federal law doesn't have jurisdiction at that level. If they did, the states that have it specifically in their state constitutions wouldn't, because they would have been challenged in SCOTUS.
If you google "banishment' and "states", you'll find this to be true. Try this one:
Yeah, isn't funny how none of the Antifa scum get this same treatment with worse crimes committed... So that would mean these judges are not applying laws in a equal manner. That they can get slapped for but we all know SCOTUS won't do shit until 1 of them hangs for their crimes of legislating from the bench while also denying reprieve to those of us who have already had are rights violated by this 2 class system...Remember when SCOTUS ruled that was legal until it wasn't. Maybe when SCOTUS told Dread Scott 'tough shit you're property' and that was legal.
There's no law or rules stopping a judge from doing it.
A judge in his/her court is basically an emperor. If there's no rules forbidding it, they're free to do as they wish, and the local authorities have to uphold it. If the DC judge says he's banished, then he can be arrested on sight before the deadline of the order.
Thats the point, its clearly anti-1st amendment no law or judges ruling will change the fact its unconstitutional
It's not unconstitutional. The only jurisdiction in DC is their district laws, and they have no law against it. Federal law doesn't have jurisdiction at that level. If they did, the states that have it specifically in their state constitutions wouldn't, because they would have been challenged in SCOTUS.
If you google "banishment' and "states", you'll find this to be true. Try this one:
https://law.jrank.org/pages/4646/Banishment.html
It states the US Constitution does not forbid it, and it was challenged as recently as 2000, when they upheld it's use in specific circumstances.
If you want to argue it, go to SCOTUS. As of 2000, they disagree with you.
Yeah, isn't funny how none of the Antifa scum get this same treatment with worse crimes committed... So that would mean these judges are not applying laws in a equal manner. That they can get slapped for but we all know SCOTUS won't do shit until 1 of them hangs for their crimes of legislating from the bench while also denying reprieve to those of us who have already had are rights violated by this 2 class system...Remember when SCOTUS ruled that was legal until it wasn't. Maybe when SCOTUS told Dread Scott 'tough shit you're property' and that was legal.