547
Comments (7)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
Amen 7 points ago +7 / -0

After the Nov 3rd election, Scott said he would literally help us throw the voting machines in the ocean if there was a second election with the dominion machines. My thought at the time was - but nov 3rd was already the second or third election with this problem that we knew of? Either way, now we are at his official red line. Technically we passed it without him flying to GA and throwing out the machines.

I’m a daily subscriber of Scott, but I can’t help but wonder - will he honor his word and join in direct revolutionary action as he committed? What happens to a Scott when all his thoughtful rationalizing is proved insufficient in the face of reality (the objective one), and when violence becomes practical?

3
50red 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same here, paid subscriber, follower since 2016.

He's been redrawing his line a ton since Nov 3. Said he hates bullies, etc. Well, the left "won" through bullying.

2
Amen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ll do some positive mind-reading and speculate that Scott is a good man trying not to be ostracized from the fabric of his life. His shadow demands rationality, but war is fundamentally irrational.

Sometimes the rational have to take off the logic-colored glasses and fight precisely because we have been given no other acceptable option by people who don’t hold the values of rationality. To use Scott’s own conceptual framework, rationality is not the correct man for every set of circumstances.