7325
Comments (681)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
46
AmericanRaised 46 points ago +46 / -0

I Agree! I think even if Trump had doubts them stealing this shit again will be the writing on the wall for him and us here in DC we don't want to hear any delay, from the people I've talked to tonight we are not settling for anything less than Trump being certified the winner Tomorrow! We are not leaving empty handed!

16
deleted 16 points ago +20 / -4
20
digitalher0 20 points ago +20 / -0

If Donald and Co. have Epstein info they could "blackmail" congress into doing what's right or expose them all.

But afterwards I'd expose all of em anyways - time to reap

10
Walt_Kowalski 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's what I do. It's what they deserve.

3
Lionkitty 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah well the thing with releasing blackmail is it would need to be clear video with audio or it will just be suppressed/debunked by the media.

4
8thGenPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's one thing the MSM doesn't control.

The Emergency Broadcast System.

We've all seen the annoying "required tests." Maybe we'll see it actually used. Every channel commandeered to show the evidence to the world.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
5
EvaderZim 5 points ago +5 / -0

Isn't there enough evidence already? Don't we already know that the governor and secretary of state in georgia planned to suppress votes, allowed dumping, and then lied about it? We know how many people were registered before the election, so if if happened they had to be in on it or they couldn't dump votes. Then they refused to let Trump see the data, because they know it's crooked.

That's why they are talking about changing the rules, but only in ways that don't actually help election security and don't make it easier to vote legally.

Anything that lets them discount votes is basically handing power to cheat again. We need massive funding for election security and transparency and public records so they can't steal it.

5
R-A-T-S- 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doesn't matter how much evidence there is if judges throw out the cases before even seeing anything. "Oh you brought the fraud case to me on tuesday? Nope Has to be friday. Since you didn't bring it on the right day, I'm rejecting this and you can't submit again for seven days."

2
2020_DJT_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

The judges reject this because the judges were the ones who violated the constitution.

1
Make_More 1 point ago +1 / -0

As long as they don't see the evidence of fraud it's not a legal election. It's as simple as that.

4
Handy499 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the way

8
KneadThePeople 8 points ago +8 / -0

Here with you Pede. It’s the 6th or never.

4
AmericanRaised 4 points ago +4 / -0

100%