This video explains it well. The data they use comes from the official source, and forks into two identical streams, one going to news organizations, and one to the Secretary of State.
This post doesn't state there was removal by fraud. This post states there was removal. Once you corroborate that with all the previous evidence and data, acquired from official sources, you may or may not come to a conclusion of fraud.
Again, I would direct you to the first video I linked. The data scientists explain in detail how data entry mistakes in their data are not possible due to the numbers coming directly from Dominion and other tabulating machines in an automated process, and never during the transfer should be manually edited by human actors, unless they are committing manual fraud.
Source: https://twitter.com/Antifearmnger/status/1346677102561652736
This video explains it well. The data they use comes from the official source, and forks into two identical streams, one going to news organizations, and one to the Secretary of State.
This post doesn't state there was removal by fraud. This post states there was removal. Once you corroborate that with all the previous evidence and data, acquired from official sources, you may or may not come to a conclusion of fraud.
Fat-finger once, sure. Fat-finger hundreds of times, extremely unlikely. I urge you to study the Edison data for swings in reported numbers like this.
Again, I would direct you to the first video I linked. The data scientists explain in detail how data entry mistakes in their data are not possible due to the numbers coming directly from Dominion and other tabulating machines in an automated process, and never during the transfer should be manually edited by human actors, unless they are committing manual fraud.