Settlements arent laws. If a settlement directly contradicts an federal election law, then its invalid. the only ones that can change election law are legislators. its plainly stated in the constitution. An agreement between a person and an activist group cannot change election law. Saying the court wouldnt just let something illegal happen is ignoring literally every time that a law was passed and then later repealed as unconstitutional. The court lets illegal things happen ALL THE TIME.
The elections are run as dictated by the state. That is also stated, plainly, in the constitution. Federal election laws say that states pick the winner on election night, why didnt we know the winner until a week later?
Settlements arent laws. If a settlement directly contradicts an federal election law, then its invalid. the only ones that can change election law are legislators. its plainly stated in the constitution. An agreement between a person and an activist group cannot change election law. Saying the court wouldnt just let something illegal happen is ignoring literally every time that a law was passed and then later repealed as unconstitutional. The court lets illegal things happen ALL THE TIME.
The elections are run as dictated by the state. That is also stated, plainly, in the constitution. Federal election laws say that states pick the winner on election night, why didnt we know the winner until a week later?