11218
Comments (1383)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
89
jazpan1 89 points ago +94 / -5

Trump loves America too much to see a civil war kill innocent people. Which I understand, but don't think is right. More people will die now because of communism and the great reset.

26
Hshsvsvsvsv 26 points ago +26 / -0

There wouldn't be a need for a civil war if he had done what was necessary in the first place

3
Hshsvsvsvsv 3 points ago +3 / -0

His presidency could gave been historic

Simultaneously ensuring free speech on the internet while taking out the fake news. Because it was important to take out the fake news. Instead he kind of sa by.

3
SaviorNdisguise 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly!!!!

2
NerBolanski 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was a good defender but forgot to go on the offensive. if Trump went on the offensive and enacted harsher laws, he would have stopped the rigging efforts. Trump tried to deal with the GOP in respectful terms but forgot that politicians are backstabbers and they don't care about loyalty.

15
WildElk7 15 points ago +15 / -0

This is a war against communism that infiltrated our society, school systems, media and government while we slept. Our WWII "greatest generation" is rolling over in their graves, as this generation is losing America on our own watch.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
Angerisagift 8 points ago +8 / -0

Office holders do not have final authority. Power derives from the consent of the governed. Otherwise it’s just force and in that case it’s a fight.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
KiltedTailor 0 points ago +1 / -1

The Confederacy agreed with your sentiment, and look what happened to them; D.C. POWER over whelmed them.

1
Angerisagift 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well it was the North under the first Republican President, a man from Kentucky and Illinois, which ultimately prevailed over a rebellion started by the South which denied the consent of people. First of course their insistence on chattel slavery after already ended elsewhere. Then they were forcing Northerners to participate (Fugitive Slave Act) and trying to turn the nation pro slave by having Kansas and other future territories join as slave states.

So I don’t think there’s that much of an analogy given that it has been Dems then and now that are all about forcing people to kill and oppress.

As for an actual 2nd Civil War, it wouldn’t look like the first one. It wouldn’t be a small agrarian economy supporting a uniformed army against another army with way more resources behind it. This would also get ugly, uglier in some ways, but there are patriots throughout the country and we definitely have more men with proficiency in weaponry. Or we can say war is so horrible that we just let the Dems and Ress rule as tyrants for a new dark epoch.

7
Swellingsuperman 7 points ago +7 / -0

He has to know they'll just go after his family next.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0