Go read the 12th Amendment. It spells out Pence’s duty very clearly. Just because POTUS says something doesn’t mean it is accurate. There was no agreement with him from Constitutional scholars outside those he surrounds himself with who had very...outside readings of the amendment.
please explain.
what legal options were there for Pence that could have made a difference?
any legal pedes here?
not saying i dont believe you.
just want. you know. legal facts.
seems to me, if GEOTUS stated something to that fact, and stated it publicly, there is merit there, no?
otherwise, why bother calling out Pence and that option at all?
further. who cares about downvotes.
maybe link the legal verbiage that attests to or deminishes your statement?
i dont think im asking for too much.
i want to be armed with information. thats all.
Go read the 12th Amendment. It spells out Pence’s duty very clearly. Just because POTUS says something doesn’t mean it is accurate. There was no agreement with him from Constitutional scholars outside those he surrounds himself with who had very...outside readings of the amendment.
i read the wiki. it looks like a lot of rules for who decides on majorities and electoral colleges, and their roles.
i didnt see anything to do with the role of a sitting vice president regarding fraudulent votes. regarding the original posting.
help me out here, legal pedes.